CourageousCordiah14

Welcome, CourageousCordiah14!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions!
You might like to check out our tutorial, a resource created especially for new users like yourself.
You also may want to introduce yourself to the community at the new user log.
I would suggest a look through our policies and guidelines.
If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or at our questions forum.
I hope very much you enjoy being here with us, and I wish you luck with your contributions.

- Zapptastic at 23:53, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

CSD

Please do not remove CSD tags, as you did with The Redheads. You may discuss the nomination on the talk page if you disagree with it. (|-- UlTiMuS 03:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Frayne Daisy 0036.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Frayne Daisy 0036.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism Warning

The articles you created about The Redheads, including No No, Nooooo, No, Therese Cardinal, and Tabitha Grimes, are considered vandalism because you made up all the information in the articles. I have deleted all of these articles. If you continue vandalizing Wikipedia like this you will be blocked.--Alabamaboy 01:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Alabamaboy 01:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

You have also added misleading information to Amanda Seyfried, Marisa Rudiak, Sara Rivas, Sean Matic, Todd Caldecott and Daisy McCrackin (I deleted the last five since there was so much misleading info and you created the article). If you do this again you will be blocked.--Alabamaboy 01:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Wildthing61476 03:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Amanda Krueger

Please do not provide false information for articles, it is considered vandalism. I see that you have a history of doing this. Do not continue with this course of action. Bignole 20:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Unnecessary pages

I see you have created a number of pages about fictionnal characters. This is unadvisable, see WP:FICT for details. Moreover, many of these articles contain essentially original research. Pascal.Tesson 05:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

Actually, I have gone through your edit history. Most of it concerns tweaking the birthdates of minor celebrities or adding random false facts about them. This is a blatant case of vandalism. Pascal.Tesson 06:22, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Pascal.Tesson 06:22, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Cordiah Hayes

The article you created at Cordiah Hayes was listed for deletion as An article about a real person that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject, criterion 7 in the criteria for speedy deletion, Articles section. Since it appears to be about you I've moved it to your user space instead, which was probably what you intended in the first place (a common mistake among newcomers!).

If you really did mean to create an article about yourself please be aware that this is often considered a bad idea, even if you do meet the guidelines for inclusion of biographies.

I know Wikipedia can be confusing for new editors, so you are welcome to ask for help at the help desk or on my talk page. Mytildebang 19:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Jack "Jackie" Mercer

An editor has nominated the article Jack "Jackie" Mercer for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack "Jackie" Mercer. Add four tildes like this ~~~~ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Jack "Jackie" Mercer during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bobby Mercer

I've nominated Bobby Mercer, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Bobby Mercer satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby Mercer and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Bobby Mercer during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sandstein 19:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:2099722822.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2099722822.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Article for deletion

A tag has been placed on Sara Rivas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

notability

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. F3rn4nd0 ^{(Roger - Out)} 12:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dr. Susan McAlester

A tag has been placed on Dr. Susan McAlester requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Plrk (talk) 01:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Andy Barclay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andy Barclay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Barclay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 02:04, 8 November 2013 (UTC)