Vandalism warning edit

Do not change people's heights or weights without citing reliable sources. Crossover1370 (talk | contribs) 03:06, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

he is 6"4

I assume "he" refers to Mikey Williams. Of the three sources, ESPN and 247Sports list him as 6'2" and Rivals gives his height as 6'1". Crossover1370 (talk | contribs) 03:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2021 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Caleb Houstan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 04:58, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Caleb Houstan, you may be blocked from editing. —Bagumba (talk) 15:54, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —Bagumba (talk) 15:55, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

New message from Bagumba edit

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Basketball § Caleb Houstan. —Bagumba (talk) 05:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2021 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 21:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to St. Marcellinus Secondary School. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Meters (talk) 20:51, 9 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Caleb Houstan ‎, you may be blocked from editing. Stop messing around. You are just back from a block and right back at it. Meters (talk) 20:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC)Reply