Colgsher
Welcome
edit
|
March 2018
edit
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Fate of the Furious, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 05:45, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
You have repeatedly added the claim that this is a romantic fantasy film. You have been reverted by several other editors.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] This is disruptive edit warring.
I am removing it again. If you would like to restore it, you will need to discuss the issue on the article's talk page and establish a consensus to do so. If you restore it without said consensus, I will ask to have you blocked from editing. - SummerPhDv2.0 15:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
edit Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, List of accolades received by The Shape of Water, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You have similarly made this claim repeatedly. You will need to cite a reliable source for the claim should you wish to restore it. SummerPhDv2.0 16:02, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Saiph121 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC) |
Colgsher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why i am being blocked? I wasn't committing any disruptive edits. Nor connected to this Saiph121. Colgsher (talk) 23:07, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
In your next unblock request, you should comment on the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saiph121. PhilKnight (talk) 23:39, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Colgsher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
In response to this Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saiph121 allegations, my account is not considered as a sockpuppet nor connected to the actions of Saiph121 and if i was not able to provide a reliable source to classify The Shape of Water as a romantic fantasy then this was considered as a major mistake. I'm also stating that my account will never commit any disruptive editing in any form and if ever made that mistake, then i apologize and will not do it again. Colgsher (talk) 00:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm not sure where you get the idea that this account isn't considered a sockpuppet. SQLQuery me! 03:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Colgsher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm stating my reasons that my account is not a sockpuppet to this Saiph121. This account is truly independent and has no connection to this user that you're referring. Colgsher (talk) 03:43, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Clearly not independent. Again, you need to address the information given at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saiph121 to be considered for an unblock. Yamla (talk) 12:53, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.