Welcome! edit

Hi Cisternet! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Waggie (talk) 01:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, Cisternet. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 18:23, 25 July 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gallery House, London (July 25) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 18:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Cisternet! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gallery House, London has been accepted edit

 
Gallery House, London, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 19:43, 28 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Mark Twitchell edit

Hi, sorry for the delay. It looks like the problem has been resolved by Cullen who page-blocked the editor concerned. If there are any similar edits it will probably be a sockpuppet so you could ask Cullen to check, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 23:18, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ruba Katrib moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Ruba Katrib, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 05:06, 23 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi GermanKity! Thanks for the heads up. I felt the article met Wikipedia's notability guidelines, as this person is an active curator at MoMA, one of the most prominent international museums. In writing it, I looked at similar articles, like Stuart Comer and Mark Godfrey. I cited credible journals like ArtReview, Art in America, and ArtNet News. I wrote from a neutral point of view, and I am not writing about myself or my own business. So I'm not totally sure what you felt was lacking here; could you please be more specific? I'd appreciate it! In the meantime, I've also added citations from the New York Times, the New Yorker, and the Wall Street Journal. Cisternet (talk) 05:37, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruba Katrib has been accepted edit

 
Ruba Katrib, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Innisfree987 (talk) 23:27, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply