User talk:CiTrusD/Archive 1

Archive 1

Thanks

Thanks for the work reverting vandalism! There are some great tools and discussion at WP:VAND. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page, User_talk:TeaDrinker if I can help with anything. Keep up the good work! --TeaDrinker 22:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

---

I would just like to say that your recent deletion of information from the article about the movie "Rear Window" by alfred Hitchcock was somewhat biased. Just because I had a different opinion doesnt make me wrong. ;-) 75.50.254.75 22:31, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't carry any opinion on Rear Window to be honest, however, the section you created was solely your reaction to the film. An analysis section already exists, so try expanding on that rather than writing your own review within the article. CiTrusD 22:36, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for writing the article on Kurt Cobain. I enjoy how you guard it by the minute. How is your article possibly neutral when its skewed so heavily in the direction of Azzerad's book. It's really neat that you've devoted time to your vendetta against vandals. How about having a vendetta against all of the misinformation about Kurt Cobain. He preferred to scramble the facts about himself all the time. And everyone else has their own unique version of the events surrounding his final years. We can speculate and share opinions on obvious signs defining what happened. I wasn't extreme or too opinionated in my small revision.There is no way you could be a Cobain fan other than maintaining connection through your mutual home state. If you were a true fan you would be repulsed at the idea of the day Kurt set eyes on Courtney. I saw your picture on the 'net (hat backwards), why not write articles on Snoop Dogg or Eminem instead? And forget the Bruins.

Branded a vandal!

I dont mind being asked to find citations mate. I have citations and I could easily apply them to the changes that I made to the space elevator page. But if you are going to brand me a vandal in front of everyone in the history of that webpage before I get a chance then you can stick your wiki son. I have better things to do with my time. Get a real job mate!

Great job!

You're doing an amazing job keeping the vandals at bay. Keep it up! Gzkn 02:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

What?

CiTrusD, the last edit that I made was removing the words "i love nachos" from a page about the name Richmond. How is that vandalism? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.23.251.224 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC).

I didn't warn you about vandalism for your edits to Richmond, I warned you for your edits to the Wikipedia:Introduction page and July 20th. CiTrusD 23:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo 06:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for getting mine too! -Kubigula (ave) 06:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

I figured you two would do the same for me. Vandals are no fun. CiTrusD 06:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry for the mistake

Apparently when I was reverting vandalism on Mac.Robertson Girls' High School it sent the warning to you instead of the intended target. Sorry for the mistake. Cheers. Canadian-Bacon 06:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Not a problem. Thanks for reverting the mistake on my page. CiTrusD 06:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi

When using certain template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. --1568 06:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

wierd....

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. But I'm not entirely sure how you found it.... wierd.20:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, CiTrusD! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 06:24, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Careful

Please can you take care before reverting edits? I was using several windows, and this window logged out. Just because an anon made an edit, doesn't mean the edit summary is a lie! (This is in reference to your reverting of my archiving efforts. Thank for that.) :-) Skittle 20:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

It's okay, was just annoying as I'm sure you can imagine! Was trying to move quantities of text, and some of it was reappearing! Skittle 20:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

User talk:172.129.32.46

What an interesting user this is/was... hmmm... Keep up the good work with the vandalism or anti-vandalism as the case may be. Have a great weekend! Tiggerjay 02:18, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

face/off

i clearly did explain why... i wrote that i was deleting the goofs section as it added nothing. be bold etc etc. 81.96.160.6 (talk) 03:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC) at least look in the history before you accuse me of vandalism. christ... 81.96.160.6 (talk) 03:33, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

if you want to work all those goofs into prose, go ahead. i'm not going to, and i think the article is a lot better without 20 odd goofs that are probably pasted from imdb. 81.96.160.6 (talk) 03:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

vested interest? what are you talking about? i just watched the film and thought i'd lookat the page, saw it had a huge list of goofs and thought "hmm, that seems largely unnecessary, and looks like crap" so i deleted. there was already a comment on talk from someone else about doing the same thing, so i did it. can't see what kind of vested interest i could have. and like i said, if you want to work it into a paragraph, go ahead, but i think that deleting it is the answer. as far as i'm aware there aren't any 'notable' goofs in face/off like the red car in ben hur, and the same info is probably available all over the net, so why have it here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.96.160.6 (talk) 03:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Gordon B. Hinckley

Just to be sure-that wasn't me that put on Pres. Hinckley's page that he was "a great man." I am certain he was, but I didn't write it. The only parts I changed to the article were to indicate Thomas S. Monson as his successor and to put the recent death tag on the page. Hypnometal (talk) 03:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Revert on space elevator

I've just taken the liberty of reverting your reversion on Space elevator (diff). You said it had been identified as vandalism; I'm not sure why; it was apparently a good faith attempt to improve the article. Admittedly, it could do with a citation, but that doesn't make it vandalism. --Scott Wilson (talk) 11:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

142.162.15.25

Hello. It is often best to de-escalate situations like this instead of constant reversion. Additionally, users are generally allowed to remove notices once they have read them. See Wikipedia:User_page#Removal_of_comments.2C_warnings and Wikipedia:Don't restore removed comments. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 23:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Harry hundal

Splat! All gone. Cheers, FreplySpang 03:37, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

PROD on De La Calle Pa' La Calle

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from De La Calle Pa' La Calle, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-{{prod}}ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Redfarmer (talk) 14:46, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Sigma Nu eh

If I felt like revealing my identity online I'd prove that I have Pin and you need to do what I tell ya.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 08:48, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll tell you that it's in central florida. No games intended, I just like keeping my privacy.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 08:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I've got the whole family thing to worry about. You get a little more careful when you consider their interests. You never know who could be reading your stuff online these days and decide to do something wacko.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 08:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Ha! That's a good call. I live in a more populus area than where I went to school, so the wacko factor is much higher.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 09:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Pluto

Didn't mean to remove your speedy tag on that Pluto article, I was actually redirecting it right when I saw your tag and I just went ahead. If you have an objection I'll put it back.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 10:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Himnisfier Syndrome

Never mind the {{underconstruction}} tag; it's a hoax, and I've taken it to AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:52, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

• I see you've noticed. No reply needed. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

new article erased by you

Hello Citrus, i'm a new user trying to contribute in Number theory Algebraic numbers, I just publish an article but it was deleted by you, please help me out to get it publish, on the other hand trying to publish complex math expression its dificult my article it writeen in TeX , can you give me any hints

thanks a lot oscar —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oordaz (talk • contribs) 01:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

New Pages

Hi. Thank you for your help with the vital work of patrolling new pages. I noticed that you are not marking some of the pages you've reviewed as patrolled. Please do remember to click the 'mark this page as patrolled' link at the bottom of the new page if you have performed the standard patrolling tasks. Where appropriate, doing so saves time and work by informing fellow patrollers of your review of the page, so that they do not duplicate efforts. Thanks again for volunteering your time at the new pages patrol project. BigDunc (talk) 21:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

It was 127 Rickson but when you look here it says you did. But I marked it too, so maybe a glitch so no offence intended. BigDunc (talk) 21:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

me

what are you talking about i have done nothing wronge, to "motherfucker" or to "recession"!

Console Heroes

Hi I was wondering why you tabbed my page for a quick deletion because it was a legitemit page that I will still in the process of creating so If you could plz give me some facts to why you deleted it or kindly put it back up.Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Consoleheroes (talk • contribs) 03:40, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

copyright

I wish to grant Wikipedia permission to use material from my sites, www.thechildrenrock.com and www.jimib.com but do not wish to place a statement to that effect on my sites. Thank you, (Wow2210 (talk) 04:42, 23 August(Wow2210 (talk) 16:13, 23 August 2008 (UTC)))

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jimi_Bertucci"

Invite

Please accept this invite to join the Mariners WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Seattle Mariners. Simply click here to accept!

No prob

No worries - it's good to know that vandal fighters are so fast! Graymornings_(talk) 09:38, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Archive 1