User talk:Chuq/Archive8

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Forfuxake in topic Tasmanian Football League

Tasmania article edit

Chuq, I noticed that in the article, you edited out the statement "80% of the population live in 3% of the states' land area." as you couldn't find any online source - this might be available on the ABS site by looking up the rural balance of Tasmania, but the figures are in CDATA software - you divide the number of people in inner regional/outer regional Tasmania by the land area, and that pretty much gives you the statistic - the next population statistic "down" from outer regional is "remote australia" - the definitions are fairly easy to find on the ABS site. If you can find something from ABS or online that's official or more accurate, by all means, please leave it in your talk box, I'd like to know too! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.176.7.23 (talk) 08:13, 14 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good to see edit

Youre back in the thick of it - I'm in sydney for very short time - theres an outside (very very unlikely) chance we might be in hobart in a week - more likely melbourne though - before driving back to perth :| SatuSuro 14:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Corey Delaney edit

Please see Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Corey Delaney. We must have been thinking it at the same time. Mind replacing yours with this more media specific one? ALLSTARecho 06:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

A-League all-time records edit

In reply to my (talk) page:
Gah, that's what happens when you get all confused with odd number of games. I think some may have been incomplete or something so I went and edited some. It seems to be fixed now by the looks of it though. Would take a fair amount of time to code that without some sort of help to make all the correct numbers appear as needed. Cheers for the correction though. Chalkstar2188 (talk) 13:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rage tv logo.png edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Rage tv logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cricket maps edit

Thanks for the kind words. :) Bongomanrae (talk) 10:27, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Aust Barnstar edit

  The Australian Barnstar of National Merit
for your efforts with Australian articles Gnangarra 00:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

TLE hot 100 edit

u reverted

  • The Living End hold the record for the most consecutive entries in Triple J's Hottest 100. The band made the chart every year from 1997 to 2007, missing out, however, in 2008.

to

  • *The Living End hold the record for the most consecutive entries in Triple J's Hottest 100. The band made the chart every year between 1997 and 2006.

there is a slight difference, there has been no Triple J Hottest 100 for 2008 and it was rather poor wording, perhaps you should word your edit summaries abit different..... --Dan027 (talk) 13:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm confused, Dan. You say "there has been no hottest 100 in 2008" and that's true. But according to you, THAT's the thing that Chuq edited out! What are you complaining about? PN57  03:03, 29 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Triple J Hottest 100 Volume 10 DVD.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Triple J Hottest 100 Volume 10 DVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Triple J Hottest 100 Volume 11 DVD.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Triple J Hottest 100 Volume 11 DVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FFT Logo.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:FFT Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Worldwind for Twofold Bay edit

Hi Sometime ago you uploaded Image:Worldwind-SnowyMountains.jpg. I would really like to see a worldwind image of Twofold Bay. Its a bit beyond me. Can you help? thanks --Matilda talk 21:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Highway exits Question edit

Hey Chuq, just finished another highway exits section (south arm hwy). quick question, I've left space in each one for km each intersection is from start of hwy. How would one work out distances with out a car at ones disposal? thanks mate Wiki ian 06:18, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hey Chuq noticed you've been online and made edits, wondering about answer to previous question, if you dont know all is good. I just cant think of another editor who would know any more about the relating matter. Thankyou Wiki ian 20:41, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cricket maps edit

Don't worry about changing things in my sandbox, it saves me from having to make the changes later. :)

I'll create another map just for the one-day comp, two seperate maps will probably make things easier in the long run. I'll grey out the ACT on the current map and leave it on both the Pura Cup and Twenty20 as is.

For the one-day map I'm thinking about maybe using the Aus+NZ locator map and colouring that the same as the current map, and then colouring the NT orange (I think that's the state colour)? Do you think that'd be okay or would it make just things a bit confusing? Bongomanrae (talk) 07:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah that's what I was worried about. I ended up just leaving the NT grey and colouring NZ black. How do you like this?  

This shouldn't confuse anyone at all (touch wood). Bongomanrae (talk) 07:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC) Obviously hasnt met the geographically challenged majority of eds yet :( - SatuSuro 00:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

BetacommandBot edit

I see that you dispute BetacommandBot's disputes. Good for you! I agree that it needs to be fixed. Betacommand seems disinclined to fix its problems, if only because he doesn't agree that they're problems. I'd like to get him to fix one problem -- just one. He should change his bot so that it appends multiple notices. If the last thing on a talk page is a BetacommandBot dispute, then instead of adding Yet Another dispute paragraph, it should create a list of images. This would help the bot to be less offensive at a task which requires great delicacy. Can you help me get Betacommand to realize that this change needs to happen, or if that cannot be done, to get BetacommandBot banned? RussNelson (talk) 03:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Lindisfarne Interchange edit

This page has been nominated for deletion. In my opinion it is notible, just lacking citable sources to write in more info.
Would appreciate any opinions or advice you may have to offer. Thanks Chuq. Wiki ian 10:35, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Please ignore this message Chuq, Od Mishehu declined the speedy deletion and i have since updated the information on page as best as a i can. Thanks anyway mate. Wiki ian 12:10, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Hey sorry about changing it to 8 but it has been publicsley announced that it has been expanded to 10 teams so i am going to change it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.180.247.216 (talk) 08:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Help with sources edit

Hello again Chuq, just noticed you sourced a reference for the crane mis-hap on the Tasman Bridge. As i tried finding that source myself and failed, i was just wondering what search engine you use and what sorts of search parameters you type? many thanks Wiki ian 06:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Help with maps edit

after looking at your map section i've been inspired to do a few of my own. If tracing a map (outline of state only, everything else will be different) what sort of copyright tag must i add? many thanks Wiki ian 05:14, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

White elephant edit

Hello... sorry to disturb, but since you were in the neighbourhood... would you mind taking a look at the talk page for White elephant? An editor has been repeatedly adding text regarding two subjects that I feel are not suitable, especially in light of the recent cleanup of the page. I'd appreciate an additional opinion (either way) to help resolve this matter. Cheers. --Ckatzchatspy 22:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

see also edit

Please stop removing the see also links on the Newcastle Jets season pages. Please note in the guidelines - "however whether a link belongs in the "See also" section is ultimately a matter of editorial judgment and common sense". The see also links are directly parallel with articles in question and are therefore warranted. Jared Wiltshire (talk) 06:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

International Football Competition Infobox edit

Hello! Yeah, I was trying to fix it so that the "final positions" section doesn't show up if none of its parameters are set, but I couldn't do it yesterday. I realized today, however, that I was close to resolving the problem on my last edit that I reverted, I just missed one little thing (forgot to use }} ). But now it works, I guess, at least the the old revision of 2010 FIFA World Cup that was using the original template instead of the "future event" one shows up fine :-)  ARTYOM  09:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Another user posted a note about it on the template's talk page. I added |champion_other, |second_other, |third_other and |fourth_other parameters, which can be used if the winning team is not in the {{fb}} template. The values of the parameters should be the original code instead of just winning country (e.g. {{fbw|Germany}}). Note that the template is called "Infobox International Football Competition", so it probably shouldn't be used for, let's say, basketball competitions, although it can also perfectly serve for that purpose :)  ARTYOM  10:01, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
I guess we could make it so that it doesn't automatically wrap the winner into {{fb}} template instead of introducing |champion_other parameter. Yet if you look at Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Infobox International Football Competition, you will notice that the template is used on mostly national men's team competitions, so there will only be a small number of articles that will require the usage of "_other" parameters.  ARTYOM  11:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Other sports? edit

Yeah - what a grab bag - have been meaning to do some surf breaks and arts - if and when i ever do - that other sports section needs a damned good cleanup!SatuSuro 07:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just like my south west tas 'sort out' (remember that?) - the surfing thingo will eventually happen sometime - no holding breath though :( SatuSuro 09:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Seasons articles edit

Even the Mariners' ones are trashy. I seriously don't know what a good season article would look like, but I'll see if I can get this years' Central Coast one looking half decent over the next week or so. Daniel (talk) 08:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Association Football (soccer) edit

Why are you revert warring with 121.219.30.130 over this? It's OK to use "football" further down in articles, but soccer is the common name in Australian English and therefore should always be mentioned in the first sentence. Grant 06:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Template:Hobart suburbs edit

hi Chuq, When creating the hobart suburbs template i added the area of sorell and the suburb of midway point, this was quickly removed and at the time i agreed that i didn't count as part of the greater area of hobart. However after seeing countless webpages Stating the opposite (eg [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]) i have decided to re-add these areas to the template. I'm making you aware of this in advance on the odd chance you see the changes and dont like them. If you're unhappy with the examples I've provided just google "greater hobart" + "sorell" for many more. if you still disagree please reply to my talk page so we can reach consensus on the issue. Kind Regards, Wiki ian 02:18, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Football in Australian English edit

Have a squiz at the entry for "football" in the Macquarie Dictionary, which lists all the games known as football in Australia. It notes that football = soccer is growing. It also says that Aussie rules and rugby league are the games most commonly known as football. Therefore, for the moment at least, whether one is in Tasmania, WA, NSW, Vic, Qld, SA, NT or ACT, the common name of the game is soccer, regardless of what the FFA, a few bureaucrats or a handful of Sydney-based journos may decree. Grant 06:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yep, the IP is me. I have barred myself for several weeks to reduce the ridiculous amount of time I spend here. Unfortunately the pommie-dominated Wikipedia soccer Association football fraternity have decreed that "football (soccer)" is unacceptable. I find "Association football" unacceptable because no layperson calls it that and WP policy is use common names. I don't think "Association football (soccer)" is "overly descriptive" or "messy and unnecessary", although "football (soccer)" would be better. Grant 17:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Template:Aus dom cricket seasons edit

A tag has been placed on Template:Aus dom cricket seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Triple J banner.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Triple J banner.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

  The Tasmanian Barnstar of Merit
For your help with Tasmanian articles please come and help revive the Tasmanian Wikiproject
this WikiAward was given to {{subst:PAGENAME}} by ~~~ on ~~~~~

SatuSuro 01:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

TfD nomination of Template:TripleJ edit

Just letting you know I've nominated Template:TripleJ for deletion because it's superseded by Template:Triple J -- Tsuite T/C 01:56, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

gmail edit

sorry to do this but - you have one SatuSuro 09:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Geeze you quiet at times - good to see you on - a lot has happened re s number of things since i last tried to talk with you :| SatuSuro 02:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC) Oh well one day - must say you are as elusive as the tas project :| SatuSuro 02:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC) Hey man I know more who have left than are active (heheh) I have also created a south west tas cat, a west coast cat and am about to do a central highlands cat - we have some very active climbers doing central mountains stuff and over time i might even get to do some more west coast arts and south west tas arts - apart from trying to get shark bay wa out of the doldrums - i keep finding more to do - good to see you can pop in - real life can sure take a toll on wikipediaing - cheers - good to see youre invovled with the bigger thing too (wikimedia oz etc) SatuSuro 02:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cripes hope I dont get blamed for the sudden burst - all my new south west and west tas stubs dont have coords yet :| SatuSuro 08:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ALaunceston%2C_Tasmania&diff=218511695&oldid=218507755 ahah - now we know, a lonnie/northsider living down there - we west coasters used to always differentiate between the trainee teachers in queenie - either the northerner lonnie types or the southerners - and the strange little posse of cars rushing east out of queenie on the friday arvos suggested that the southerners were more prepared for 10 hours driving on the weekend to be with loved ones was stronger than the northerners connections :) SatuSuro 01:37, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

A-League edit

I understand your point, but I don't see why you need to do that when I already did the work to make a template that already does everything you need it to do. It's a modified version of the MLS infobox, which itself was only a modified version of the football league infobox. All I did was better format the terminology for the MLS, and since most of those differences are held in common between the MLS and A-League, I don't understand why they can't just share the same solution. I just don't want you do have to do more work than necessary. -- Grant.Alpaugh 23:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

What is wrong with this image (it has both uploader and licensing templates)? Tagging of images is clearly a job for a real person, not a bot. -- Chuq (talk) 06:34, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Are you sure you're referring to the correct image? I don't see anything wrong with it. My bot has never touched the image, and I don't see any indication that anybody else has tagged it either. --Carnildo (talk) 06:56, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Aurora Stadium edit

I've put an informal warning on the talk page of the IP who has been reverting your work. That way hopefully they'll go to the talk page instead of keeping this up. I'd already reverted it once as possible vandalism. AFL-Cool (talk) 01:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I was just going to tell you about the new user, and you noticed it first! Yes - and a check user may help, given the last edit by the IP before he started with the ID on the IP's talk page. AFL-Cool (talk) 08:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I just gave Aaron a test4 final warning given the last one was before his last edit on the page. AFL-Cool (talk) 08:12, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

York Park edit

The record crowds does tend to lend itself well to a list format, but all featured articles have such sections as prose, and as a result good articles should follow. Take a look at some featured articles for grounds for more help, e.g. Portman Road, Priestfield Stadium and Valley Parade, which are all English football grounds. Peanut4 (talk) 11:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Triple J JFiles book.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Triple J JFiles book.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Andy Lee (comedian) edit

Hi. I'm working on Andy Lee (comedian), Hamish Blake, Hamish & Andy (radio show) and a few related articles. I want to keep them all consistent with each other. If you feel this way, could you also take a look at the equivalent section in the other articles? - Richard Cavell (talk) 11:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

FAR - Shrine of Remembrance edit

Shrine of Remembrance has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.

AfD nomination of Sols edit

 

I have nominated Sols, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sols. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Hiding T 11:58, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


Cassy O'Connor edit

 

A tag has been placed on Cassy O'Connor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thewarranty (talk) 12:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

persistent vandalism edit

clearly i am a vandal. Why else would i blank pages and place them up for speedy deletion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thewarranty (talkcontribs) 12:53, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

User:Thewarranty edit

He's a crazy vandal, not a broken bot. He tried to have my article on the Northern Premier League's 2008-09 season deleted for being "...a very short article lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article..." despite being a comprehensive article of some 8,600kb and five screens in length. I see he's recommended one of your articles for deletion. I'm not normally one to recommend subverting established rules, but personally in this case I would suggest that you invoke WP:IGNORE and delete his request for the sake of Wikipedia and sanity. I would have done the same for my article, but two other Wikipedians - including a bot - already did it for me. Falastur2 Talk 12:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

He's been given an indefinite block. I guess that sorts that one out. Falastur2 Talk 12:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
No problem. And this guy's a real nut. He's not blocked after all, I just caught him in recent changes. The box on his userpage claiming he's been blocked was put up by himself along with a sockpuppet notice, with the accompanying note "soon though". Don't suppose you want to finish the job for the good of us all? :)
Oh, and I didn't notice you were an admin when I recommended you take down a RfD. I thought I was recommending to another average Joe like me to go behind the admins' backs :P Falastur2 Talk 13:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ok, now you blocked him :) I seem to be permanently one step behind today. Falastur2 Talk 13:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Youre not wrong narelle edit

A wise alert was given indeed at the board SatuSuro 13:52, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Aurora Stadium Fixtures edit

Why are you getting rid of 2008 fixtures that Aaroncrick keeps adding?? Other minor AFL grounds such as Carrara Stadium and Manuaka Oval have the fixtures. Is this personal all something? grow up and stop it! Lukeyslegends (talk) 02:07, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Don't be rude.
Chuq, I've warned Aaron that if he continues this I will take the matter to a formal process. This is getting ridiculous I think and he refuses to listen. AFL-Cool (talk) 11:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

What is a formal process? Aaroncrick (talk) 11:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Where a senior person on this website does a review of a user's behaviour and a consensus is established as to how to respond to things like removing other people's comments from a user's talk page other than their own. AFL-Cool (talk) 11:24, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tasmanian Football League edit

Chuq, I need a hand here. User:Forfuxake is adding a lot of material onto the above page, which is okay except that he isn't citing his sources. At the moment it looks like a WP:OR violation. I put a tag on the top of the page, but he has now removed it three times (not in violation of 3RR because the gap between the three edits is too wide) and not provided sources despite my placing that note in the edit summary. We've already had one dispute over the origin of the Burnie Hawks which is why I'm hesistant to confront him again on this issue. Would you mind? I didn't fill in the edit summary on my last revert because I did the undo and as far as I'm concerned removing the tag on this occasion qualifies as reverting vandalism. AFL-Cool (talk) 02:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

For now. He hasn't edited since the last removal. But thanks nevertheless. I'll let you know if I catch him before you do. I have the TFL page on my watch list. AFL-Cool (talk) 23:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
And you got him! Good work - and great edit summary. AFL-Cool (talk) 05:01, 22 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I apologise for all the arguing and reverting tags at the time, I was totally unaware of Wikipedia's rulings etc on such things. It's taken me awhile but I'm kinda getting the hang of it now, cheers for being patient :) Forfuxake (talk) 20:42, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Launceston Article Downgrading edit

The Launceston artice has been downgraded from a B-class to a C-class. Do you think this is fair?? It may have a lot of dot points but lots of valuable information. How can bidgee downgrade it? Aaroncrick (talk) 09:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Pointer to discussion about TV episode redirects edit

Hi, Chuq. It's been a while since the dispute about TV episode article naming, and I hope all is well with you. I wanted to let you know that there's a new (much smaller, I hope!) discussion about whether to keep the redirects that have "unnecessary" disambiguation or not — one of the byproducts of an early compromise move in that debate. The new discussion is at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)#Redirects, with related discussions at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 October 8. Hope to see you there. —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 18:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Manual change only? edit

Need to check - manusal changes only on this:- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Tasmania/Related_pages#Geography

Will you be around (ie Hobart) in first week of december at all? SatuSuro 11:22, 17 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

W-League Disambiguation edit

Sounds great to me - differentiating the US game from Australia's and others' via reference in US to USL W-League. Sounds fine.

Denidowi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Denidowi (talkcontribs) 13:38, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

York Park edit

Hello Chuq, I've recently made a fair few edits to the York Park page. Do you know what else could be done to improve the article. I've also recently listed the article for a peer review. Cheers Aaroncrick (talk) 03:43, 5 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, As your an experienced Tasmanian (Former Launceston resident) editor on wikipedia, I would appreciate if you could look over the York Park article i've recently edited and see if there is is any clear errors. As you may well be aware the article is again a GAN. Thanks very much, Aaroncrick (Tassie Talk) 08:28, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ah well I guess your no talkies. BTW the article is a GA. Aaroncrick(Tassie talk) 08:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008 edit

The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:13, 17 December 2008 (UTC) Reply

No content in Category:Tasmanian politicians edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Tasmanian politicians, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Tasmanian politicians has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Tasmanian politicians, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Meetup edit

Hey please convince all to have a piccie! Scuse my incessant intemperate comments re the project/silences - I have suggested the visitors should try for some publicity :) - might get a few more contributorss on board. Had thought of trying to track you down when i was wandering Hobart a few weeks ago but had sworn myself to internet silence for close to a month, it was great. cheers SatuSuro 10:12, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

A-League number of teams edit

If the season coming up will have 10 teams, then I would change it now to say there are 10 teams in the league. If you look at the MLS article, you'll see that is what we've done. Seattle Sounders FC have not kicked a ball in anger, but we list the league as having 15 teams, have them included as one of the teams in the Western Conference (not as a "future" team), etc. So if that is the situation, I would just make the change and remove the parenthetical from the equation entirely. -- Grant.Alpaugh 18:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Another issue I was unsure about would be the inclusion of the team colors in the list of teams and around the map. I didn't remove them because I've seen these on a number of Aussie sports articles, and I wanted to respect something that might (unbeknownst to me) be a uniquely Aussie tradition. If this is not the case, however, these should be removed as they exist solely for decoration. If you want to see the club's logo or colors, you should click on the link to go to their article. -- Grant.Alpaugh 18:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Vote for Football as the Australian collaboration edit

Hi -- I recently nominated Wikipedia:WikiProject Football (soccer) in Australia/To-do for the Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight.

This WikiProject has been inactive for a long time and with the World Cup coming up, it would be good for football (soccer) articles to be in depth and comprehensive in Australia.

If you would like to support it, click here for the project page to cast your vote

Thanks! Australian Matt (talk) 02:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

City sporting teams templates edit

Hi Chuq, I figured you'd be a good person to ask as you seem to be a bit of a soccer nut and also know the in's and out's of Wikipedia.

Long story short, I made a bunch of templates which list the major sporting teams in a particular city (ie: {{Gold Coast Sports Teams}}). Because I have to use "Association Football (soccer)" in each template it makes the whole template look ugly as the name area takes up so much space. I'd like to be able to use 'Soccer' as the name instead.

I know this is not in line with the naming convention agreement which has been made by others but I'm thinking that for these particular cases that it's not such a big deal to overlook it. What are your thoughts and do you know where I might be able to officially put this forward? Cheers Bongomanrae (talk) 14:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply