Chtsai016
Nice work! edit
|
The WikiCookie | |
| You've learned how to use basic wikicode in your sandbox. You can always return there to experiment more. |
Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. Chtsai016 (talk) 04:20, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Chtsai016, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Chtsai016! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:23, 27 August 2015 (UTC) |
Welcome! edit
Hello, Chtsai016, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please complete the student training, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Materials
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:14, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Thermoregulation edit
Hi, welcome, and we have a tricky problem on this article. Basically, it's been in a mess for years (since 2007 at least). It's actually in such a mess that anyone coming to it to try to find out about the topic is going to be hopelessly confused. With such a text, the addition of a carefully-researched new fact like yours is like a straw in a broken dam: what we need to do is rebuild the basic structure so readers have some chance of seeing how the nicely-cited new facts actually fit in. Otherwise, they just become more confusing stuff to distract the reader's understanding. Could you possibly have a word with your tutor about this? I have started a discussion (on the Thermoregulation Talk page) where you and others are welcome to join in and work out what we can do together to sort it out. I think this could be very good for your coursework; it may require more than one person, but that should be manageable. In the meantime I have moved your comment to the talk page as it forms a good example for the discussion. Hope this isn't too much of a bother for your course. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Chiswick Chap. Thanks for your message - our instructor spoke to us today about this issue of our students adding random bits of information to other articles. I apologize for adding to the confusion in the article! We were assigned bees to write Wikipedia articles on at the beginning of the semester. Our assignment this week was to link other Wikipedia articles in our own bees we wrote about, and then go into other Wikipedia pages to add information about our bee to link it back to the bee articles we created or improved upon. Thank you for moving it to the talk page for discussion- in general many of my peers are having difficulty linking other articles back to our specific bee species and integrating that information into the article better because of the high specificity of our article and bee species. If I have more time at the end of the semester I will try to work on reorganizing the thermoregulation article with other peers. In the meantime, I will be more careful about adding information about our bees to other articles and try to integrate it more smoothly. While we would like to improve articles by simply editing, fixing minor errors, or fixing refs, our assignment requires us to add information to other articles that are pertinent and link back to our specific bee. Thanks for your help! Chtsai016 (talk) , 15:11 5 November 2015 (CST)
- Great. Thanks for the thoughtful reply. Weaving the pages together isn't as easy as it might look! Chiswick Chap (talk) 22:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC)