Chemfreak94
Chemfreak94, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
edit
|
Hi Chemfreak94!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
Welcome!
editHello, Chemfreak94, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please complete the student training, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:01, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
keratin
editThis article is a complete disjointed train wreck in my opinion. It is an excellent opportunity for you to step and really show me what you got. That section with the genes and sequence alignment is just citation fishing by someone, but note that deleting will just upset them. It can however be moved down somewhere more appropriate. This one needs a fresh outline. I would start there. Reorganize the sections from that nice starting paragraph to a list and describes the different types and structures found in nature. You can then get more complicated leading up to that section with the genes if that person does not slam you when you delete it. then the clinical significance with maybe adding some genetic diseases then the applications after that. A major rewrite is warranted. I would copy the whole thing over to my sandbox reorganize it and put i back to see what people say then do one section at a time after that. good luck! you have a good one. Jparcoeur (talk) 15:52, 30 October 2015 (UTC)