Your username

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Draft:Fleetwood_Nautical_Campus, and I noticed that your username, "FNCWebmaster", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Qcne (talk) 15:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fleetwood Nautical Campus (January 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 15:31, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, FNCWebmaster! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 15:31, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fleetwood Nautical Campus (January 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheBritinator were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TheBritinator (talk) 17:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi, Can you please explain why it is different to this article? Warsash Maritime School - Wikipedia
This has Portsmouth News and Superyacht News references; Blackpool Gazette (local newspaper was deemed not suitable as references in the Fleetwood article). Some references on this article are to it's own website - Warsash Maritime School. How s this a trusted, independent source? References 7-13 relate to a source Aldridge, M. H. (1996). A history of the Southampton School of Navigation. The Southampton Institute. The link here is broken so the reference can't be accessed or verified.
The Warsash article is written in a similar style - the style was intentionally copied in the Fleetwood post to ensure compliance with Wikipedia standards. Some specific examples of why The Fleetwood article does not comply would be helpful. Caroline at Fleetwood Nautical Campus (talk) 09:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Caroline at Fleetwood Nautical Campus, apologies for the delay in reply to you.
We do not compare drafts to existing articles: unfortunately Wikipedia has many millions of poor quality articles, many of which would not be accepted if submitted today. As we're a volunteer project no one has gotten around to improving / deleting them.
The key policy at Wikipedia is verifiably. A lot of your draft has no in-line citations, so readers have no idea if the information written is true. My advise is to first find some reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the college (newspapers, TV shows, books, etc), then build an article by paraphrasing from them. Qcne (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply