Ishiai

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Ishiai, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! PDCook (talk) 19:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Christian R. H. Raetz

Greetings. I reverted the edit you made to the Christian R. H. Raetz article, because the addition of the wikilink to biomedexperts was out of place. Regards, PDCook (talk) 19:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

In looking at your contributions, I noticed you added similar wikilinks to biomedexperts in other articles. Be sure that any such additions you make fit the context of the surrounding text and are not simply tacked on to the end of a reference. Regards, PDCook (talk) 20:00, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Talk back

Hello, Ishiai. You have new messages at User:MS.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Whiteberry

Here's what's said on the profile page, plus a little more for relevant weeks.

Release date: 2000/08/09

Total sales: 648,390

Weeks charted: 17

Highest position: 3

First week sales: 25,580

Weeks in chart (position/sales)

2001/01/29 76

2001/01/22 64

2001/01/15 53

2000/11/13 69

2000/11/06 62

2000/10/30 32

2000/10/23 22

2000/10/16 15

2000/10/09 15

2000/10/02 7 48,930

2000/09/25 6 71,290

2000/09/18 6 95,270

2000/09/11 4 137,890

2000/09/04 3 130,310

2000/08/28 6 44,460

2000/08/21 13 25,580

Did you need any of their other releases? --Prosperosity (talk) 03:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Ikimono Gakari

It's difficult, it depends on your definition of a week. It spent both one week and two weeks at #1, as in first two weeks of January are a special combined week, for some reason. So at the end of two weeks, we get data from Oricon (instead of weekly like the rest of the time). I believe Oricon counts it as a single week, though I'm not too sure. --Prosperosity (talk) 22:38, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Re:

Olá! Por que eu deixei? Você já viu aquilo? é uma anarquia. Os textos são mal-escritos e qualquer artigo capenga é elevado a "featured" (destacado). Aqui, ao menos, o negócio é sério.

P.S.: Se puder, der uma olhada em Pedro II of Brazil e participe da nomeação para "good article". --Lecen (talk) 18:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Quer ter uma idéia do que estou falando? Leia o artigo Decline and fall of Pedro II of Brazil e em seguida o verbete "Proclamação da República do Brasil" na Wikipédia em português. Você entenderá com exatidão assustadora quanto ao que me refiro. --Lecen (talk) 18:44, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Relaxa, por que eu me chatearia em trocar idéias com um compatriota? A verdade é que eu simplesmente não tenho tempo para escrever os artigos em inglês e depois traduzí-los para português. E por que escrevo em inglês? Por duas razões: por que é a língua universal e por que a wikipédia em língua inglesa é a mais acessada do mundo. Assim, qualquer pessoa que souber inglês e desejar traduzir o artigo sobre o Imperador Pedro II para o chinês, russo, espanhol, o que seja, poderá fazê-lo. Mas quantos chineses, russos ou espanhóis sabem ler e escrever em português? Além de que por diversas vezes eu pedi no verbete em português sobre Pedro II para traduzirem a versão em português e sempre me ignoraram. --Lecen (talk) 19:38, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

flag of Japan (cc)

Hello.

You is the third user with the largest number of editions in the article of Flag of Japan. In the Portuguese Wikipedia the article of Flag of Japan is the same, except that in Portuguese. I work in creat articles for "to blue" the article in Portuguese Wikipedia. And I realized that both articles in both languages are dead links. And earnestly ask, is not there a way to recover the dead links or substitute another source? In the Internet Archive failed, In this sites Category:Web archives could be good? I believe that the best way would be to find another source.

Thank you for your attention. Sorry my bad English. Bruno Ishiai (talk) 22:29, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

You really need someone who can read Japanese well. I found this page:

Information contains Defense Specifications (DSP)

...and if you look in the "Miscellaneous, etc." section you'll find "FLAG, NATIONAL, JAPAN" containing links to two relevant documents:

ENACTMENT

ERRATA

• Ling.Nut 00:54, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Featured list

I'm sorry, but I'm not entirely sure what you're asking for (I've never used that tool before). Only one of those links seem to be bad, and I suppose you could use this as a source for that. --Prosperosity (talk) 12:40, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Bruno, I am very, very sorry for not answering you earlier. Unfortunately, since I have already nominated two article as featured candidate, I am not allowed to nominate another one. Anything else you might need from me, do not hesitate on asking. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 02:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

One. Although you could be co-nominator in another article, which I am. And it would make no sense to me to nominate your article since I have no clue on the subject. In the end, I would be of no help to you. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 02:24, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Maeda

Olá, ainda não li o artigo sobre o Maeda na wiki portuguesa. eu considero as políticas de edição da wiki em português muito ruins aliado a editores metidos a puristas acadêmicos e por isto eu passei apenas a contribuir para a inglesa. Sou bastante conhecedor dá história do Maeda e 80% do artigo em inglês foi originado por mim. Com algum apoio para editar o artigo em português pois não tenho mais paciência para ficar discutindo com jiujiteiros e editores para defender minas contribuições, eu terei prazer em ajudar. Loudenvier (talk) 04:10, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Rollback

Can you roll back the rest of the tagging of anime and manga related articles? Except for the core topics, articles are not double tag because there is an over 90% correlation between WP:ANIME and WP:JAPAN and tagging every article with both is simply banner spamming. —Farix (t | c) 04:25, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Fall of Ruad

Hi, I meant that if you would like to do a good article review of Fall of Ruad, like to be the reviewer, I would be willing to make any fixes you requested. --Elonka 04:24, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Ah, não há problema! Obrigado pelas gentis palavras. Mas o que é msn? --Elonka 04:37, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Oh, AOL Instant Messenger e Google Talk são melhores para mim. Você usa esses? --Elonka 05:29, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Ishiai! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:57, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

Whiteberry

Lesseee.... Here is an imcomplete listing of their tie-ups, and one is an NHK educational drama from 2002. Here is the site for the drama, called Dotchi Dotchi!. Their song Umarekawatte mo Atashi de Itai was used as the ending theme song. JA Wiki says that Be Happy was used as an insert song (a song played in a pivotal moment/in pivital moments), but I don't have a source for that. --Prosperosity (talk) 08:49, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

New Page Triage engagement strategy released

Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox - okeyeswikimedia.org.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 01:58, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited Attack of the Killer Tomatoes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Miller, George Wilson and Jerry Anderson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pope John Paul II's visit to the United Kingdom

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pope John Paul II's visit to the United Kingdom you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ishiai -- Ishiai (talk) 03:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, it's great to see the article going forward for GAN, but I didn't actually nominate it. I wrote much of it though, so I'll keep an eye on your review and address as much as I can. Thanks, This is Paul (talk) 09:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pope John Paul II's visit to the United Kingdom

The article Pope John Paul II's visit to the United Kingdom you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Pope John Paul II's visit to the United Kingdom for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Relentlessly -- Relentlessly (talk) 20:41, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of BiomedExperts

The article BiomedExperts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:08, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ishiai. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ishiai. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Atenção usuários da Wikipédia

Quero uma arbitragem nesta questão. Usuário Chronus afirma que eu o insultei. Onde e quando ocorreu isso? Apenas disse que ele está promovendo uma perseguição às minhas edições e isto É VERDADE, E QUE ISTO PARECE PESSOAL, o que eu também acredito./ O usuário apagou todas minhas mensagens dirigidas a ele. Insiste em apagar minhas edições, e afirma que estou promovendo uma guerra de edições contra ele. Solicito a arbitragem de um editor sênior para confirmar suas alegações.

Usuário:SanSilva 21h20min de 7 de fevereiro de 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SanSilva (talk • contribs)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ishiai. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)