Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Alex (Talk) 11:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

December 2007 edit

Welcome edit

Welcome back to Wikipedia. To find out more about how to make useful contributions, take a look at the welcome page. To stay in Wikipedia, an article has to be about something notable, that is, of general interest. Click on Notability for an explanation of what that means. Also, it must give independently verifiable sources. Articles that don't meet these requirements are deleted. Follow the links below to learn more:

  1. To find out more about creating articles, read the introduction, tutorial, and the guide to creating your first article.
  2. Do not write articles about yourself, your company, your band, or your best friend - that's a conflict of interest.
  3. Wikipedia is not for things you made up one day.
  4. For experiments, please use the sandbox.

JohnCD (talk) 11:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Royal rumble drinking game edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Royal rumble drinking game, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Royal rumble drinking game. JohnCD (talk) 11:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Royal rumble drinking game edit

I have nominated Royal rumble drinking game, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal rumble drinking game. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Bovlb (talk) 02:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

December 2007 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Royal Rumble (1994), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Royal Rumble (1994) was changed by Bruinfan13 (c) (t) deleting 9151 characters on 2007-12-10T06:14:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 06:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notability edit

If I find anything that doesn't demonstrate notability, I delete it. To stay in Wikipedia, an article has to be about something notable, that is, of general interest. Click on Notability for an explanation of what that means. Also, it must give independently verifiable sources. Articles that don't meet these requirements are deleted. Follow the links below to learn more:

  1. To find out more about creating articles, read the introduction, tutorial, and the guide to creating your first article.
  2. Do not write articles about yourself, your company, your band, or your best friend - that's a conflict of interest.
  3. Wikipedia is not for things you made up one day.
  4. For experiments, please use the sandbox.

In view of the comments above, it would also be a good idea to familiarise yourself with other Wikipedia policies. Jimfbleak (talk) 16:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Answers to your questions edit

"Deleting the Royal rumble drinking game page would call for deletion of about 50% or more of the articles on wikipedia, for they do not meet the notability requirement... "

Yes, there are far too many non-notable articles, and people are working hard to weed them out - look at the list here of all the ones nominated for deletion on the same day as yours. But What about those other articles? is not a good reason for keeping another non-notable one in.

"...or a vote of EVERY one on wikipedia."

This one has now gone to "Articles for Deletion", where everyone who cares to has a voice. (Not a vote - the issue is settled by the arguments for and against, not by the numbers)

"And how can something become notable people like you continue to block pages from coming up?"

Something doesn't become notable by being in Wikipedia - it has to be notable first, by being good or interesting enough that lots of people are playing it, talking about it, commenting on it, writing about it in the papers... then a Wikipedia article can be written citing independent sources, so it counts as notable.

JohnCD (talk) 21:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reply:Vince McMahon edit

Because "Outside interference" is not a move, and never will be. And that is pointed out quite a few time in the prose of the article. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 17:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply