Brickell4

March 2012

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Hog-dog Rodeo. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I've tried to explain to you that Wikipedia works through cooperation between users, and that content must be verified by reliable sources. How it does not work is by self-proclaimed experts dictating what can and cannot be used to verify that content based on their own prejudices, and by resorting to petty name calling when they see something they don't like. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being incapable of playing well with others. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 00:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brickell4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked for reporting an administrator in the approved method and when I did that either the administrator using a proxy account or a friend blocked me for punishment

Decline reason:

No, you were blocked for repeatedly being abusive and lacking the competence and temperament to edit here. 28bytes (talk) 00:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Forgive me, I wasn't aware that mattered that I had removed the unblock request. However my second unblock request still stands, would an administrator besides Usertalk:28bytes examine this unblock request (Jimmy Wales was definitely right about what he said in the past about administrative duty on wiki pages).  ;)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brickell4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was immediately blocked as punishment after reporting an administrator through the approved method for administrative abuse and name callingBrickell4 (talk) 00:58, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This sufficed. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 01:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• No, you were blocked for this. I suggest the reviewing admin consider removing talk page access, as it has quickly become obvious this user is just trolling. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
  • You are not allowed to remove comments for the reviewing admin. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

• As promised, I have revoked your talk page privileges. 28bytes (talk) 01:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)