Bowei Huang 2

Stop it

You were just told to stop disruptively redirecting articles. You've created a slew of useless redirects, and changed others from useful targets to less useful targets. Someone told you to stop this already, you deleted their warning, and continued as though you hadn't been warned. Coupled with your borderline trolling of the reference desks, and you are quickly wearing out your welcome here. Consider this a final warning... --Jayron32 04:17, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

No, seriously, stop

Stop messing around with redirects. There's no reason for it. And on the reference desk, either engage with the people who go to the trouble of answering your questions, or stop doing it. AlexTiefling (talk) 10:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Really, stop now

Stop dicking around with redirects. At the very least explain yourself and respond to the people talking to you. Blanking your talk page without response looks very suspicious. --Pfhorrest (talk) 17:48, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

You have been blocked from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 00:58, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bowei Huang 2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Can you please unblock or at least set an expiry date for unblock of my account? I promise I will stop my disruptive editing and useless redirects. Bowei Huang 2 (talk) 00:32, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:09, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bowei Huang 2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry. I understand what I have been blocked for. I have been blocked for creating too many useless redirects. But I was mostly and mainly creating new redirects, not changing old existing ones. Although the redirects may be useless, that doesn't mean and explain why that I shouldn't create them. Anyway, I promise I will not create too many useless redirects in the future and will make useful contributions instead. Bowei Huang 2 (talk) 00:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I see no understanding what was wrong with these redirects, therefore your promise to cease creating them doesn't work as you can't tell a useful redirect from useless. Additionally, "I will not create too many useless redirects" doesn't quite look like a 100% assurance. Max Semenik (talk) 06:58, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bowei Huang 2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I now understand what I have been blocked for. I have been blocked for disruptive editing. But creating too many useless redirects wasn't disruptive editing. If it was, then I promise I won't edit disruptively again. If it wasn't, then what was my disruptive editing? Changing old existing ones? I didn't do that very much. Whatever my disruptive editing was, I promise I won't edit disruptively again.

Decline reason:

Still denying the disruption. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:20, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bowei Huang 2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

OK. I am not going to deny that creating too many useless redirects was disruptive editing. I don't know what was my disruptive editing. So what was it? Was it creating too many useless redirects? Was it changing old existing ones? Can you please tell me? Whatever my disruptive editing was, I promise I won't edit disruptively again.

Decline reason:

And what about your block evasion? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 06:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bowei Huang 2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I promise I won't evade blocks again. Bowei Huang 2 (talk) 04:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you think parroting back a vague promise not to do something is going to wash this time, I'd rethink. You've already had chance after chance, and have continued editing disruptively every time. A bare promise certainly doesn't convince me this time around the block would look any different. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:45, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bowei Huang 2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This block shouldn't be indefinite. There should be an expiry date for this block. I have been blocked long enough. Please don't block me indefinitely. Please don't block me forever. Please either unblock me now or set an expiry date for my block. Please. I beg you. Bowei Huang 2 (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Please include a decline or accept reason.

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bowei, you never did anyone the courtesy of having a conversation with them when you were on here. As a long-serving reference desk user, I see no reason whatever why the powers that be should agree to your self-serving whining. AlexTiefling (talk) 09:08, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Since he wants a specific end date... maybe 5 years? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 09:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Too soon. How about 'next time the UK celebrates a royal diamond jubilee'? AlexTiefling (talk) 09:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

That could work. I would also advise any admin thinking of unblocking, to watch this video (after the ad):[1] ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 09:35, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

WP:ANI

I'll be asking for help in dealing with your rule-breaking deletions. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 03:03, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Disruption continued through sockpuppetry

In October 2012 using the sockpuppet user:FY5867, Bowei Huang 2 created and edited redirects in exactly the same fashion that resulted in this account being blocked. See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 January 15#Poverty in North Korea for examples. Thryduulf (talk) 14:30, 16 January 2013 (UTC)