Billelar
Possibly unfree File:Royal Danish Library Logo3.jpg edit
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Royal Danish Library Logo3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:57, 27 December 2008 (UTC) --Skier Dude (talk) 07:57, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
The logo is outdated. We can delete
Nat. Vet. & Agr. Lib. + Nat. Lib. of Educ. of Denmark edit
I restored the entries of these two libraries in the List of national libraries since, as their name indicate, they are national libraries. I initially considered your action as vandalism but discovered later that the introduction to the list wasn't clear enough about 'secondary' national libraries. So, I consider now that your action was done in good faith, with a definition of a national library more restrictive that what has been applied on that list, and I apologize for having qualified it as vandalism. Clpda (talk) 18:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 30 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Royal Library, Denmark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Diamond. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
The article Erland Kolding Nielsen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. | Naypta✉ opened his mouth at 11:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Danish Royal Library Logo1.jpg listed for discussion edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danish Royal Library Logo1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Willy1018 (talk) 14:34, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Royal Danish Library Logo2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 05:38, 11 January 2019 (UTC)