Berwil 92083

San Diego County

Could you please fill in the edit summary with each edit, as to why you are making a change. This allows other editors to determine motive when figures (as well as other material) are changed, often done by vandals. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 13:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Vista Courthouse.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Vista Courthouse.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:58, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Civic Center Drive

It is Escondido Avenue, not Civic Center Drive. If it's been changed we need to see a source. The street name was changed as of May 1, 2010.. see google maps- http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Vista,+CA&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Vista,+San+Diego,+California&gl=us&ei=OHxHTKHtK83PngeZj5j8Aw&ved=0CBoQ8gEwAA&ll=33.187128,-117.288837&spn=0.056603,0.10849&t=h&z=13

Also, this is your third revert, meaning that you are close to breaking WP:3RR. You can get blocked for this. --Rschen7754 22:44, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Please be careful next time. It appears you are correct [1] but your edits broke the table. If you are not familiar with table syntax, please consult the help pages. --Rschen7754 22:58, 21 July 2010 (UTC).

Why can I get blocked? I have done numerous edits before and never got any block warning. All I was trying to do was switch 'Emerald Drive' which is listed as being in Oceanside to Vista.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Berwil 92083 (talk • contribs)

It's not the editing that is bad; it's continually reverting to your version of the article without explanation. Please read WP:EW. Also, using edit summaries is helpful. --Rschen7754 23:06, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Would you fix the table for me then? I would appreciate that. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Berwil 92083 (talk • contribs)

It's already been done. Please remember to use edit summaries in your edits and to check this page as soon as you see the "You have new messages" header. --Rschen7754 23:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on California State Route 78. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rschen7754 22:45, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Vista, California.   — Jeff G. ツ 01:13, 22 July 2010 (UTC). what is the inappropriate link? I only added the link to an amusement park.

I wish to be unblocked from editing. I was told I would be blocked if I added inappropriate external links. I only added a link to a family fun park, Boomers. How is that considered inappropriate. I am appealing the block.

It does not appear that you are blocked. You are free to continue. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 02:27, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

A friendly note

Please pardon us for the warnings above. We have a number of recent-changes patrollers who scan for and revert recent edits that may fall into a number of categories ranging from outright vandalism, to policy violations, to simple formatting errors. Unfortunately, these tools also tend to generate somewhat impersonal notifications to the contributors whose edits are being reverted. I've reviewed your edits and have come to the conclusion that you are one of the good guys.

I'm not sure why you got the edit-war notification. I don't think two dissimilar edits to one article qualifies. As for the external links, please take a look at the Wikipedia external links guidelines on what external sites should be linked or not links. There's a lot a gray area and editors may often disagree. In this case I think the "(avoid #13) sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject" applies. The amusement park site would be appropriate for a Wikipedia page on that amusement park, but may not be for an article on the town. That said, I think the warning above was a bit extreme.

In summary, your contributions are welcome and I hope you continue. Cheers. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 02:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much Tom.. you are also one of the good guys!!

Thank You —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.71.220.47 (talk) 23:31, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Brad Hawpe

He's listed as an OF on the Padres' roster, so that's where we list him. --Muboshgu (talk) 02:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Check the roster again, he's listed as an infielder.

File copyright problem with File:Vistacourthouse.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Vistacourthouse.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:59, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

I took the photo myself and released it into public domain. It is and already has been posted as being public domain.

File copyright problem with File:Civic Center.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Civic Center.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

I took the photo myself and released it into public domain, as listed.

Hanigan

Regarding your recent edits to Ryan Hanigan, you did not provide a citation that this trade is officially completed. Per WP:SPORTSTRANS, breaking news reports based on anonymous sources should not be written as if they are unconditional facts. Please discuss on the article talk page if you disagree in lieu of edit warring. Alternatively, cite a reliable source that the trade is official. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 06:55, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

January 2015

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Template:San Diego Padres roster  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster _talk 02:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Padres rosters

I noticed that you removed {{San Diego Padres roster}} on San Diego Padres and added the roster data directly into the article. Templates like Template:San Diego Padres roster are transcluded so that there aren't multiple copies of the same data, in this case the Padres roster, to maintain. Please limit your roster changes to the template. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 06:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Berwil 92083. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Berwil 92083. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Berwil 92083. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)