Barkgoesthepaper

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antano Solar John (January 4) edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by APerson was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antano Solar John and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

APerson (talk!) 01:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Barkgoesthepaper, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! APerson (talk!) 01:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

An e-mail sent to Anne Delong edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Barkgoesthepaper: I received an email from someone who said he was Antano Solar John. He said that he had received an e-mail from me offering to do online research and editing for him so that his page would be approved, and claiming to be "a Wikipedian with high privileges". I would like you to know that I did not send that e-mail, and have no idea who did. It is against Wikipedia policies for me to make this kind of offer, and just so that everyone is clear, I will not be editing Mr. John's draft in any way, but will confine my editing to some of the other 4.6 million pages. This may not have anything to do with you, but you are the one who has shown an interest in this topic, and I didn't know where else to post about it.—Anne Delong (talk) 17:54, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic