Bananaman430

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bananaman430/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Bananaman430! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

I have fixed my article, may you please check on it and if it still isn't good enough tell me some more things i can improve to get it aproved Bananaman430 (talk) 21:59, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bananaman430/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 13:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bananaman430/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Third party, neutral point of view

It is clear from the edit summary you gave with your recent edits at Voice of Reason (political party) that your intention is to cause the article to reflect the party's own preferred image. Please don't do that. Wikipedia seeks to reflect what independent, third party, sources say, not to publicise or support the way in which a person or organisation wishes to be seen. JBW (talk) 22:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Yep, they didn't get the memo.. Michalis1994 (talk) 00:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

No, I just took directly from statements of Latinopoulou which I believe to be important when considering her party. Bananaman430 (talk) 20:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Nope, they are not when considering ideology and examining from a neutral POV. Michalis1994 (talk) 21:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC)