User talk:Baa/Archival Quality/February 2009

This page is a chronological archive of past discussions from the current talk page for the period February 2009.

In order to preserve the record of past discussions, the contents of this page should be preserved in their current form. Please do NOT make new edits to this page. If you wish to make new comments or re-open an old discussion thread, please do so on the current talk page.

If necessary, copy the relevant discussion thread to the current talk page page and then add your comments there or preferably link to the section in question within the archives.

Fortified houses

Hi, Fortified houses is a substantial copy of Fortified Houses, so I have redirected it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.93.78.209 (talk) 13:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

That sounds decent enough, sorry about that. tutterMouse (talk) 13:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

can you undo the warning on my talk page? 72.93.78.209 (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

OK but it's not your talkpage but one used by several different users of your school and seems to get warnings quite frequently. I'm erasing it because it was erroneous this once, generally for shared educational IPs I just leave warnings. treelo _radda 16:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism correction

re: Artificial pacemaker

Thanks for your attempt at correction, but please note that it is best to check the history, doing a comparison on earlier files - the offending IP made a number of edits which are now reverted wholesale, rather than piecemeal by selecting a clean early version and doing a (non-changing) "edit" and "save" on it.

Best wishes, Leonard G. (talk) 23:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Huggle user

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page! I feel a little guilty: MTW anti-vandalism tool doesn't show user discussion page changes, at least not in any way I've found workable. So other editors are reverting vandalism changes on my page, but I can't even see the vandalism on other people's pages! My impulse is not to change tools, but to write another. Hmm. Still haven't decided whether the effort is worth the gain. At anyhoo, thanks! Piano non troppo (talk) 09:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

I wasn't using Huggle, I don't use Huggle on this account anymore (all that goes to TutterMouse these days) so just your regular revert. You might want to write a new tool but there's already three in common use but I think only Huggle watches across all namespaces and people would suggest to use it instead of wriitng another soley for the purpose of talkpage vandalism. I like using Huggle even though I think there's too much latency at times given the amount of calls it makes to the servers for diffs and edits so sometimes a diff may not even appear or at least that's how it is for me. I'd suggest to give it a shot but be careful, you only have to look at May 2008 in my archives to know it's a bit intense for newbs. treelo _radda 10:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism?

Thank you for leaving me a message on my talk page. I'm glad that you've explained me your reasons for the reversion and that it wasn't in bad faith. I don't want it look admonishingly but please drop a few words about why do you revert in the edit summary the next time. 94.254.167.88 (talk) 00:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Huggle

Hi there, Please see the download page for the new release of huggle. It should work and should be the only version to work. Thank Xclamation point and if you have any questions please get to me on my talk page as I will not be checking back here. --·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 21:22, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

cleaning up my userpage

Thanks, it's appreciated. :-)--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:43, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

No problem. treelo _radda 17:49, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for repeatedly reverting the feeble attempt at insulting me. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Is it more telling that nobody else bothered to revert the attempts? I mean, one was lingering for at least a minute whilst I was fixing something else. treelo _radda 21:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

So I see. I'm a bit surprised one of the anti-vandalism bots didn't pick it up. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)