March 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Treaty of Nanking have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Treaty of Nanking. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RacoonyRE (talk) 18:18, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mattibigboi (March 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Awsomeness1579! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mattibigboi

edit
 

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Mattibigboi. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please be aware that repeated vandalism editing is normally a reason for the vandalising editor to be banned from this site. And bear in mind that wikipedia has, in this situation, no sense of humour.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:50, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply