Aveouva092
Welcome!
Hello, Aveouva092, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
Since you've shown some interest in editing topics related to India, we hope you'll stay and add content to India related articles. Consider joining or watchlisting India related discussions (for example, Noticeboard for India-related topics). Again, welcome!
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, . Ugog Nizdast (talk) 16:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
February 2016
edit
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:15, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 16:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Air India. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. — LeoFrank Talk 16:31, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 19:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Air India destinations. Removing content without explanation, adding flags are the things that need to stop. As mentioned already on my talk page, kindly stop vandalizing pages — LeoFrank Talk 04:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Air India, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shrikanthv (talk) 14:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Aveouva092 reported by User:Ugog Nizdast (Result: ). Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Welcome
editHello Aveouva092 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Shrikanthv (talk) 14:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Recent edits to Air India destinations
edit Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Air India destinations, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! In veritas (talk) 18:07, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
February 2016
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. only (talk) 14:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)March 2016
edit Please do not add or change content, as you did at Air India, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 17:57, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at AirAsia Group destinations, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — LeoFrank Talk 09:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
May 2016
edit Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Indira Gandhi International Airport. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
edit Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Air Zimbabwe. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer Talk 19:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
July 2016
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Air Mauritius. Jetstreamer Talk 11:27, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Stop doing purposeless edits.
editWhy do you keep deleting and adding things with no purpose? Do not repeat it else I will report it to admin. Ajaybhal619 (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
September 2016
edit {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 14:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)- @Widr: The user continues with their addition of unsourced content [1].--Jetstreamer Talk 15:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Aveouva092. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
December 2016
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 16:04, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Please Unblock Me!! Request for Unblock!!
edit
Aveouva092 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please unblock me! I agree that I have added unsourced content but those were the wrong information on Wikipedia that I have reverted or edited. Another reason is when I finished editing any article then after saving the edits I found that some information that I have edited was provided by me on its particular section but not in the above information box. Because of that reason I had to do continuously editing on that particular page. But, since I registered here on Wikipedia, I have always provided the right information to the pages of Wikipedia. I am an aviation lover and usually edit Airline pages. But sad to see that some very common or short edit that I have done were not searched by Wikipedia users like YSSYguy and Widr. They not at all search the information on Google that I have edited on Wiki. They always suggested blocking me for 3 months, indefinitely or 1 week. Please unblock me!!!! It's a request to Widr!!!!!!!! Please unblock me!!! And please search on Google whatever I have edited on Wikipedia.
Decline reason:
You are stating that it is the responsibility of other editors to search for citations, via Google or whatever. And that your edits are appropriate because they are truthful. This is absolutely not the case. It is your responsibility to always ensure your edits are properly cited with a reliable citation. If you don't have a citation, you can't make the edit. Until we are sure you'll never again make that sort of edit, it would be inappropriate to unblock you. Yamla (talk) 18:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock Request!!!
edit Aveouva092 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Ok, then please give me a last chance afterall everybody make mistakes. I am really sorry for the editings that I have done. I am guilty for it. But, please give me a last chance. When I will make a edit next time (if unblocked me) then I will make sure I will provide a citation or reference. But please give me a last chance. Please!!!!!!! I will provide source whatever I edited
Decline reason:
You have had multiple last chances already with your previous blocks. SQLQuery me! 19:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock Request!!!
edit Aveouva092 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please give me a last chance. I will ensure that I provide sources for the edits that I make. But please give me a last chance.
Decline reason:
Indefinite doesn't mean infinite, but I don't believe that less than a week of a block is enough time for anything to change. You've had multiple long-term blocks in the past for this exact reason. Spend at least a few weeks reading over WP:RS, WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:CITE, and WP:DE and then write an unblock request indicating that you understand their contents and won't make the same mistakes again. I can't promise anything, but that will give you the best chances of an administrator considering your request. You have to convince us that these issues won't continue to be unblocked, which will be difficult given that they've recurred after each previous unblock. ~ Rob13Talk 07:58, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Curl brackets
editCan you please use the curl brackets? [2] [3] Nobody will see your unblock requests if you don't.--Jetstreamer Talk 16:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Unblock Request!!!
edit Aveouva092 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have read all the pages u sent to me. Now I have understood all the things. Now please unblock me. please!
Decline reason:
The problem with unblock requests that say things a general as "Now I have understood all the things" is that experience over the years shows that in most such cases the editor in question does not in fact understand, so that if unblocked he or she continues to make the same mistakes. Feel free to make another unblock request, but if you do so you will need to explain what you think were the problems with your editing in the past, and how you expect your future editing to be different, so as to actually show the administrator who reviews your request that you really do understand, rather than just saying that you do. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:14, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock Request!!!
edit Aveouva092 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As User:JamesBWatson told me that I have to explain what were the problems with my past editings as I have added unsourced content many times. First, when I created the account on Wikipedia, I thought every page should be creative and beautiful and should have the right information. I did not know any rules that what I have added should not only be correct but should be with a source. After reading WP:RS, WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:CITE and WP:DE for a few weeks, I have understood that every content I have added or anyone has added should be with a matching and corrective source. Disruptive editing should not be done, always I have to provide a citation to whatever I have added or edited. As I am an Aviation Geek, I mainly edit airline pages, their destination lists. I have readed Disruptive editing provokes an article to be more improved and that is vandalism and abuse of Wikipedia's rules. As for my future editings, I will surely provide a reliable source for the content I have added. Sorry to all of you for breaking Wikipedia's rules. I will always ensure that I will not do the mistakes again. Now, can any admistrator accept my unblock request so that I can be unblocked and then I have to create my user page!
Decline reason:
There isn't a sign that you are here to build an encyclopedia. The multiple unblock requests, all denied, and the number of blocks in less than a year, particularly an indef block days after coming off a 3 month block only further go to show this. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:39, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Widr: - would you object to an unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 01:02, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- @PhilKnight: If this was their first block, I would support, but since it's the fourth one, I'm a bit skeptical. But I won't object either. Your call. Widr
- I'm of a mind to decline the request. 4 blocks in 11 months, blocked for 4 months and a week of those 11, and the last block almost immediate from the previous 3 month block. This isn't an editor who's here to build an encyclopedia. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Fine, go ahead and decline RickinBaltimore. PhilKnight (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- I'm of a mind to decline the request. 4 blocks in 11 months, blocked for 4 months and a week of those 11, and the last block almost immediate from the previous 3 month block. This isn't an editor who's here to build an encyclopedia. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
(talk) 10:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC) Hi. First off, don't log out to edit. [4] Administrators will review this as time allows. Please be patient; it may take a few days for administrators to discuss your unblock request and determine whether or not you should be unblocked. You're welcome to post in this section, just don't post new unblock request templates. ~ Rob13Talk 17:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note that Aveouva092 has logged out to message me on my talk page again after the above message telling them not to do so. Adding socking to the list, I believe there's serious competence issues here. I'd recommend returning in a couple years with additional maturity/experience. ~ Rob13Talk 06:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Unblock Request!!!
edit Aveouva092 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have explained all the things. Now please unblock me Widr.
Decline reason:
Duplicate request. Stop filing duplicate requests or your talk page access will be revoked. Your request is currently being considered above. ~ Rob13Talk 20:30, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock Request!!!
edit Aveouva092 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Now please unblock me Widr. Please don't feel skeptical. I will not add any content without a source. Please unblock me! Please
Decline reason:
Duplicate request. Stop filing duplicate requests or your talk page access will be revoked. Your request is currently being considered above. ~ Rob13Talk 20:30, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Why you all are blocking me continuously??
edit Aveouva092 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am only saying that despite explaining all the things, you are doing unfair to me. I am not being aggressive, I am only saying that I would learn more in Wikipedia if you give me a last chance. I will never do unusual edits again. Please unblock me! I am begging to all of you! And if you are not unblocking me now, then atleast provide an expiry date for unblock. I will be satisfied
Decline reason:
And we are done here. There are reports of socking from other admins, and you were advised that further disruption would lead to talk page access being revoked, which it was. At this point, take the standard offer, step away from Wikipedia for six months and then go to UTRS for an appeal. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:02, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I won't review this unblock request, and I'm pretty sure nobody is going to change it into a fixed-term block from indefinite. I see below that you have had your talk page access revoked, so if this latest request is declined, what I'd suggest is that you stay away for at least the six-month period suggested at WP:Standard Offer and then make an appeal at WP:UTRS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
January 2017
edit