Aspiring Meteorologist
Welcome!
editHi Aspiring Meteorologist! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Question related to the Flint–Worcester tornado outbreak sequence
editHello Aspiring Meteorologist! I had a question related to this edit you made on the Flint–Worcester tornado outbreak sequence. In your edit, you marked that there was a 2nd F5 tornado during the outbreak. If I may ask, what source did you see for the new F5 upgrade? If the F5 upgrade is true, then the List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes needs to be updated as well. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 23:59, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- I have some evidence. According to this link:[1]https://www.masshist.org/beehiveblog/2021/06/the-great-worcester-tornado-of-1953/#:~:text=Schroeder%20in%20the%20aftermath%20of%20the%20tornado.&text=The%20statistics%20are%20staggering%3A%2094,damage%20(in%201953%20dollars) , the tornado had winds well over 300 miles per hour. The damage was already debatable as to whether or not it was f5 or if it was an f4, but with winds over 300 mph, it was clearly an f5 Aspiring Meteorologist (talk) 00:10, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Well that can be used for the estimated windspeed. However, even that does state the rating of the tornado is F4. It is the same thing as the 2013 El Reno tornado, which obviously had 300+ mph winds recorded by radar, however, the rating is still EF3. So, unfortunately, it needs to stay rated F4 in the articles, but it can be mentioned with the believed F5 intensity. Hopefully that helps. Cheers! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 00:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
May 2024
edit
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to List of people with absolute pitch while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- A Bing search doesn't remotely qualify as an WP:RS. Do not attempt to add TwoSet to that page again; the filter is there because there is a tiresome parade of fans attempting to add them at their request. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)