Asits
Welcome!
editHello, Asits, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Komax Holding, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cordless Larry (talk) 18:58, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Komax Holding
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Komax Holding, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:58, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
The article Komax Holding has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NCORP, no sources in article, can't find anything that suggests this company is noteworthy.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yunshui 雲水 12:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Komax Holding for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Komax Holding is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Komax Holding until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yunshui 雲水 08:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
January 2018
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui 雲水 08:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Asits (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yunshui blames me that I should have been using multiple accounts in an inappropriate way. That's definitely not true. Asits is the only account I have for en.wikipedia.org. Yunshui, please explain us how you got to your conclusion.
Decline reason:
Decline as this did not address the matter at hand. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asits, as that explains the conclusion that resulted in your block. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Asits (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Thanks for your explanation where the suspicion of having used multiple accounts comes from. As the company Komax Holding is well-known in the region where I live but not abroad, it is likely that content-related contributions come from this region. I really own just one single account. Furthermore I edited the page without having talked to and without having coordinated the edit with another persons. I initially created the page. The last edit I did in December 2017 was because I received an email notification sent by Wikipedia stating that the page is out of date and hence going to be deleted. Therefore I updated the page as good as my personal information allowed me to do so. Then I got another email notification about my account having been blocked, which was quite confusing for me, because I did my contribution with the best intention to improve the information on Wikipedia. Asits (talk) 00:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Even if we accept that you are unconnected to the other accounts, the fact remains that your only contributions are to an article which you created in a blatantly promotional form. Unblocking an editor who does nothing apart from using Wikipedia to promote a business would not benefit the project. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.