Welcome edit

Hello, Asad abedi, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - theWOLFchild 07:06, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

November 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Chatta Bazaar, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:46, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Noorkhan Bazar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:47, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Chatta Bazaar. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:17, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi again edit

I first posted this at the Noorkhan Bazare talk page, but I just noticed you are having issues trying to improve another bazarre page as well, so I figured I keep this more central amd move my post here;

Article improvememt edit

@Asad abedi: - Hi Asad, I see you recently tried to add some info to this page, but it was reverted. First off, I have to agree with the revert. It was poorly written and did not have an ŕattached source. I see you then left an unsigned comment about the revert on Oshwah's talk page, that didn't appear very collegial. If I could make some suggestions? ...I think I can help you out here a little.

First, you should try to engaage Oshwah here on the article's talk page, and maybe in a little more of a friendly manner. He's a great guy, really good admin and helpful colleague... all you have to do is ask. The way I see it, this article doesn't anymore original research dumped into it at the moment. You say you know the place? Great! But more than your "personal knowledge", what this article needs right now, desperately, is reliable sources added to support the already existing content. There has been a tag asking for just that at the top of the page for over 7 years now. Do you think you could find some good sources to add? Then that content could be better organized, then this article will really start to take shape. You've been here for several years and have thousands of edits, so you should have a pretty idea of what I'm saying, no? Anyway, I have no iron in this fire, I'm just a (talk page stalker) that thought I would try helping out with a little friendly asvice. Good luck - theWOLFchild 07:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Cheers wolf 07:54, 26 November 2017 (UTC)