User talk:Arundhati bakshi/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

WP:FILMS Questionnaire

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:29, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Satwant Pasricha

The work of Satwant Pasricha has nothing to do with SIkh religion or any religion for that purpose. I am going to remove all references to religion, also it should not be a Sikh biography stub...what do you think ? Please reply on my talk page...thanks Jon Ascton (talk) 17:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Soccer shcs.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Soccer shcs.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:47, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Task force roll call notice

Hello! Your username is listed on the Indian cinema task force participants list, but your user contributions show no activity within the past 18 months. Consequently, we've taken your name off of the list. If you still consider yourself an active editor of the task force, we encourage you to please add your name back to the Active Members list. Thanks! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 22:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Arundhati bakshi! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 400 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Shweta Shetty - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Beverly Engel - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Soccer shcs.jpg still missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Soccer shcs.jpg is still missing description details after an extended period and/or other details on its image description page.

This information is IMPORTANT so please try add this information if possible, or seek assistance.

If the information remains missing, the image WILL eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Who are these girls?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Soccer_shcs.jpg Arundhati (I hope it is your real name) are you one kicking the ball  Jon Ascton  (talk) 17:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Old Souls

I have nominated Old Souls, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Souls. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 15:27, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

I want to thank you for the site on Lawrence Hope. When I was 13 I found a 1925 version in my basement amongst thing that used to belong to my grand mother. Since then I have managed to get the other two collections but could never find out anything more. Never in the libraries, perhaps once found on a libraries data base. I imagined it was a English man who lived in India and was never quite sure it was a collection of a few poets because of the many titles. The style varied a little but you could see them all coming from the same person as well. Imagine my surprise finding out he was a she and that she had tried to pass it off as a collection of translations. She got me into writing and I still remember the impact that "men should be judged" had on my 13 year old mind. Funny Enough, I had the name listed on Facebook, it recently connected it to your site and made a page. I am proud to be the one and only fan. Miss you made my month. Thanks again. G. Preisel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.83.155.249 (talk) 09:19, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Wisdom Christianity for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Wisdom Christianity, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisdom Christianity until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 03:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Shamika Brown listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shamika Brown. Since you had some involvement with the Shamika Brown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Off2riorob (talk) 16:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Preciousdoe.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Preciousdoe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:54, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Preciousdoe.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Preciousdoe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:33, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Milton Hallman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Milton Hallman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milton Hallman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 17:52, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Suncoast Seabird Sanctuary

The article Suncoast Seabird Sanctuary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

nn organization

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 21:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)