Arjun RL

Arjun RL, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Arjun RL! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2.0 (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2.0 (film) was changed by Arjun RL (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.93571 on 2018-12-01T15:26:09+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:26, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for continued removal of material. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mifter (talk) 17:48, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Blocked

As you went straight back to removing content once your block expired, I have re-blocked your account for a further month. Fish+Karate 13:37, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Petta (film). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 16:30, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

The edit I made is reasonable and true.People like you are the real drawbacks of information providing sites like Wikipedia. Arjun RL (talk) 09:32, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Problematic edits

Hi there, I don't know what these two edits were about, but in this edit you added unsourced content about a sequel to Lucifer being announced. Or at least that's what I'm inferring, since the phrase "A sequel to the film Empuraan is announced" contains ambiguous grammar, making it sound like you're talking about the film Empuraan and that a sequel to that film has been announced. And in this edit you added this unsourced sequel information in the middle of the vandalism template, which is pointless. I suggest you start double-checking your contributions, because competence is required at Wikipedia and if you keep making sloppy edits that require other editors to fix, we will revoke your editing privileges. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:17, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

The sequel of the film is already officially announced and all of us know that anf you are unaware about the announcement.People like you are the real drawbacks of information providing sites like Wikipedia. Arjun RL (talk) 09:30, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Oolkatal, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 13:43, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Drishyam 2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 22:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Abraham Ozler, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)