Hello Arius1996, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Arius Laueren Raposas, good luck, and have fun. KonsulRomanumSPEAK to the Consulate 07:58, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Kilala mo ako.

Proposed deletion of Code Antony

edit
 

The article Code Antony has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no apparent notability or even confirmation of the book's existence based on Google search. Not even the publishing house appears anywhere except here.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine 13:17, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply


Articles for deletion nomination of Code Antony

edit

I have nominated Code Antony, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Code Antony. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Constantine 11:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Feedback

edit

Your request for feedback at Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 May 4 has been replied to. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:25, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:File-Soviet Air Force MiG-31.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:File-Soviet Air Force MiG-31.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:22, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Feedback

edit

Log-in to your account before posting on Talk pages, otherwise it's a hassle to track you down

 
Hello, Arius1996. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2011_May_7#MiG-37_Ferret.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

. MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:50, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hoax article MiG-37 Ferret

edit
 

Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did with the article MiG-37 Ferret. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you.

Don't write about a fictional aircraft as though it actually existed, and particularly don't waste volunteers time asking for feedback on a hoax article. Either write an article about your toy as a toy or don't write it at all. MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:54, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Organized crime in the Philippines

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Organized crime in the Philippines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:41, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Removing Speedy at Organized crime in the Philippines

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Organized crime in the Philippines, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this:   which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 10:44, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Organized crime in the Philippines

edit

Your contested speedy deletion has been decline for reason of copying content from another website in contravention of WP:COPYVIO. The page will be shortly deleted. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:57, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Organized crime in the Philippines

edit
 

The article Organized crime in the Philippines has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

After I removed a lot of copyvio text from two sources, there's nothing left that's actually about the Philippines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:33, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

It appears that the one remaining piece of text was also a copyright violation, taken from http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-organized-crime.htm, so there is nothing left and I have now deleted the article -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

May 2011

edit

  Your addition to Organized crime in the Philippines has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This time you copied text verbatim from http://www.un.int/philippines/dccp.htm You must not copy other people's text directly into Wikipedia articles - you must write it yourself -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:50, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Chengdu J-20 flying.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chengdu J-20 flying.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:08, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Can you tell us where you got that photo from? Are you the actual photographer? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:10, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Republic Act No. 6735 or The Initiative and Referendum Act

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Republic Act No. 6735 or The Initiative and Referendum Act requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Anthem of joy (talk) 13:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Mig 37B.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mig 37B.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:16, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You were told not to recreate deleted copyright material. In view of this and youyr other poicy violations, if you create or attempt to create or add any further inappropriate pages or content, you will be blocked. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:25, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:MiG-37 Ferret.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:MiG-37 Ferret.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Firefox (aircraft)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Firefox (aircraft). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Fictional military aircraft#Mikoyan MiG-31 (fictional). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Fictional military aircraft#Mikoyan MiG-31 (fictional) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Firefox in action.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Firefox in action.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. [stwalkerster|talk] 14:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Italeri Mig-37B.jpg

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Italeri Mig-37B.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ---- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Firefox03.jpg

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Firefox03.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ---- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:11, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:File-Soviet Air Force MiG-31.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:File-Soviet Air Force MiG-31.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:36, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 

I see you have been temporarily blocked as a result of your numerous copyright violations. I hope you will take the time to have a read of Wikipedia:Copyrights, especially the WP:COPYOTHERS section. Basically, what it all means is that you cannot simply take text you find on the web and copy it into a Wikipedia article, and you cannot take images you find on the web and upload them to Wikipedia. In the case of images, you must not claim you are the author unless you personally created the original image, and you must not claim that other people's works have been released under a CC-BY-SA License (or similar) when they have not. If you have any problems understanding Wikipedia's copyright regulations, please feel free to ask me on my Talk page and I'll be happy to try to help -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Block extended due to block evasion

edit

Due to your evasion of your block, I have extended your block, which will now expire 1 week from now. Be advised that any further evasion of your block will result in you being indefinitely blocked. Regards, –MuZemike 23:40, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

You were warned, and now you have been indefinitely blocked. –MuZemike 00:35, 8 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arius1996 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)Reply