Architect110402

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victor F. “Trey” Trahan III, FAIA (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Victor F. “Trey” Trahan III, FAIA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Victor F. “Trey” Trahan III, FAIA, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 07:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Architect110402! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cerebellum (talk) 07:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Victor F. "Trey" Trahan III, FAIA.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Victor F. "Trey" Trahan III, FAIA.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Victor F. “Trey” Trahan III, FAIA

Hi, I saw you post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Architecture and made a few rough notes.

• Hi, firstly read Help:Your first article
• Secondly is the subject notable? See WP:ANYBIO and WP:ARCHITECT. Are there three reliable sources with in depth coverage of the subject? If the subject is not notable, an article is not needed.
• I see you have edited Alejandro Zaera-Polo, you could take that as a model, hopefully without the controversy sections.
• All the sources for AZP are independent, so delete the parts of your article that are not independently sourced.
• From the lead you could keep the first paragraph and the paragraph about major works.
• Notable Works and Notable Career Honors and Awards: trim to up to around 20 works and 10 awards.
• Conservation and humanitarian efforts these are not independently sourced, so delete. TSventon (talk) 09:58, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victor Trahan has been accepted

Victor Trahan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 10:56, 28 May 2022 (UTC)