Aperisic
Welcome edit
|
RT edit
I noticed your edit. If you have a suggestion to change the wording or believe it needs to be removed, please make a section in articles talk page and say what you want to do. RT article is heavy on criticism given most of the sources used criticize the network. So don't be surprised. Paulthemonk (talk) 06:00, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
The problem with Wikipedia is that it is very biased sometimes. When you talk about subject, you start explaining what it is about, and then add a section saying Criticism. The way it is done in this article, every second sentence is about criticism, is obviously biased. I am watching all stations including RT and I find the same patter in all of them. They try to present news in a specific way, the truth is of no special interest. It is all pure and very obvious propaganda sometimes so pathetic that I am not watching any of it more than necessary. If this propaganda is permissible for one station in the world, it is permissible for all stations in the world. In that sense, if you look Chinese, Russian, Korean sources you would find heavy criticism of BBC, CNN... and none of that is in Wikipedia. Then why is it there for RT? O do not defend any of them, I am actually very sorry that world journalism has gone that way, towards media war. But when it is a war it is a war. I am just stating that Wikipedia has become the part of it. And it is annoying. Aperisic (talk) 16:13, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Removing talk page comments edit
Hi again Aperisic, this is just to let you know that in general you can't remove a discussion from a talk page if it also includes comments by other editors, as in Talk:Almost integer. It had only comments by you and me, and I don't mind in this particular case, so you can leave it as it is. Thanks, Gap9551 (talk) 20:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- If there is any value regarding the article in it, somebody would set it back. My opinion is not that relevant. I was just trying to add some value and decided that it is not something that reveals anything crucial even if true. I did not think your comments were something that should be left either, without the context. Anyway they were in the direction of "the addition not being important". Still, it is in the system. I did revert couple of edits myself if I disagreed with them, especially if they were against some sort of internal politics. I was not asking or sending messages just for sake of saving my time. Because this way, it looks like as if I did something I do not know what type of violation so that it had to be recorded. Very much part of the reasons I do not like Wikipedia that much. I just felt there should be something to add maybe. But, I felt I was wrong.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aperisic (talk • contribs) 2016-01-06T18:22:45
Was this you? edit
An IP editor made these changes to your comments on a user talk page. If this was you, you should know that you shouldn't edit Wikipedia while logged out if you have an account. There are some other policies and guidelines you have run afoul of as of recently. Please read through the 'welcome' template I added to the top of this page to learn how to contribute more effectively. Remember to sign your talk page comments by adding four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments, make sure you include reliable sources when adding, changing or removing content and to include an edit summary with all your edits. Thank you. - theWOLFchild 17:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
The file File:Connect sorting network.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)