antonio zamarripa became interested in film because as a child his grandfather pedro villa introduced him to cinematic legends like Ismael rodriguez,indio fernandez,federico fellini,polanski,elia kazan,rossellini, lubitsch and other foreign artists. but what really moved antonio was the idea of sharing his imagination and ideas to a large audience. whe Antonio was 17 years old, His first client said it best: antonio has a great ear for sound and immense vision. Together they enable him with the ability to transmit his ideas visually that capture the exact moment on film to evoke emotion from the viewer.

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Antonio zamarripa villa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - MrX 12:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

February 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Eyesnore. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Professional organizing, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Eyesnore 17:49, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply


  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Personal information management. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Do not overwrite other articles in an attempt to write about yourself. —C.Fred (talk) 02:50, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply


  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Personally identifiable information, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 03:48, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia – The Missing Manual. TBrandley (what's up) 07:09, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:13, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please stop attempting to write about yourself on Wikipedia. Writing about yourself is strongly discouraged. Additionally, you are attempting to write about yourself in inappropriate articles. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia's Help section before you resume editing. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:16, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply