Welcome!

Hello, Angrykeyboarder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Gflores Talk 18:18, 27 March 2006 (UTC)Reply


Much of the above "welcome" would have been appropriate months ago when I "joined". It's rather dated and inappropriate now.

Is this a "form letter"? angrykeyboarder 19:58, 27 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, Wikipedia isn't perfect but most users get a welcome note soon after they join. It's a templated form but they're handed out by Wikipedia members manually and it's never too late to receive a welcome note. Well, if you have questions, let me know. :) Gflores Talk 20:06, 27 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough. Thanks. :-) angrykeyboarder 20:17, 27 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

Hello, Angrykeyboarder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Gflores Talk 18:18, 27 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Cottonwood Heights vs. Salt Lake City edit

Thanks for your perspective on the issue. I think your point is well taken and that you have made a good contribution to the page. I did think it looked odd that the entry for this company differed from the address provided by the company. I would suggest putting the page on your watchlist, so that you can respond to any reverts or further discussion if you choose. --Lastexit 12:28, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply


Feel free to disagree edit

Re your comments on the Overstock.com discussion page -- I just wanted to encouratge you to continue contributing to that page and also reverting if you feel quite certain that your position is correct and is supported by WP:V and WP:NOR.

As a New Mexican I am an agnostic on the subject of Salt Lake City geography. However, I think that your position has merit and is backed up by the company's SEC statements.

The fact that another user feels strongly in the other direction should not dissuade you. Frankly the use of Cottonwood Heights bothers me as both original research and because I can find no reference to it on Google. So, if you feel it is wrong, say so. Your point of view is important in attempting to achieve consensus.--Lastexit 21:53, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Glengarry Glen Ross Trivia Section edit

To answer your question, I just feel that a lot of the info in the trivia section is valid and important, and can be moved to the main bulk of the article, as opposed to just sitting at the bottom in a list. It says in the tag: "Please help by removing unencyclopedic content or integrating content from the trivia section into other appropriate areas of the article." I plan to work on this article myself, but haven't had the time yet. - Zepheus (ツィフィアス) 17:19, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello ^_^ edit

Hey! I was just wandering around, and dropped in to leave a note. Have a wonderful day!
Saber girl08 01:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


Nope, I was just wandering around giving out smiles. Thanks for my smile! I put it on my awards page. ^_^ Have a wonderful day!
Saber girl08 14:14, 9 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

user agent edit

Hi there, you can still grab the user agent strings from the pages history [1]. I didn't remove them, but I don't think they belong. Also, if you had left your message on my talk page instead of my user page I would have seen it earlier. (Bjorn Tipling 19:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC))Reply

Your message to Durova edit

Don't believe everything you read on the technology news websites. Sam Blacketer (talk) 01:10, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

DVD Decrypter Screenshot edit

I've repliev on my talk page. SF007 (talk) 15:53, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello edit

Hi Scott! :) It's good to see you here too! hehe --Grrrlriot ( ) 18:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Technical" tag at Microwave edit

Hi. It would be really helpful if you could describe just how and where the article gets into the deep woods and ceases explaining things to the non-technical reader. This is a common problem. Your specific criticism would be very useful. A few examples would help prompt editors in fixing this up. If you've got a minute, a couple of comments at Talk:Microwave would be really great. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:59, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge edit

  You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Angrykeyboarder. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply