User talk:AnemoneProjectors/Archive 3

Thanku

U know what for. sorry im not around as much as i used to be xxx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gungadin (talk • contribs) 23:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

You're totally welcome. ^anemone│_projectors 00:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Best Kept Secret

Hi AnemoneProjectors.

Thought I'd move the discussion here. In your last edit you said "(again, it still IS an album, and the demos is a claim by Cowell, we can't say they ARE demos. also the quote was wrong as it's from two separate sources.)"

If we can't say they are demos, we can't say it is an album either surely? It's one side's words against another's. And given they're claiming one of the tracks is a duet with someone Leona hadn't even met before X-Factor Series 3 started Robert Allen (Track 4. "Private Party" featuring Robert Allen) and Leona had no contact with UEG after starting X-Factor it suggests that they're taking demo vocals and arranging them to their needs. It's definitely not finished songs.

Also is there any evidence that it was ever released? If there is no evidence it was released (and all we seem to have is some newspaper PR by Barry Bee and UEG, the contents of which are disputed) does it even fall within the remit of Wikipedia as a full album?

I could possibly understand if the controversy was mentioned as a sidenote to Leona's page, but there's far too much controversy to even suggest that it exists as an entity to give it a page of its own.

I hope you can see where I'm coming from on this.

cheers, R77 Leipzigger98 01:28, 7 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rushian77 (talk • contribs)

Hi there. Well, we have to say it is an album because some people have downloaded it, only when something manages to destroy every copy can we use past tense. I've seen on forums that it was actually available to download from Juno for a short while, but a forum isn't a reliable source. It's an album because "an album is a collection of related audio or music tracks distributed to the public" which is true in this case. I see your point about Robert Allen, and you're probably right that they are demo vocals, but we can only say Cowell claims they're demos, we can't say they are demos without absolute proof from a reliable source. I did request deletion for the article because I wasn't so sure about it after a while, but consensus was to keep it as it was well referenced! However I don't see any problem with merging and redirecting it back to Leona Lewis. There's already a paragraph about it there anyway. ^anemone│_projectors 13:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

My main beef would be do we really know it was available from Juno, or was that Barry Bee/UEG posting that it was? I know on Digital Spy for instance there were a couple of aliases from the same IP addy which were advertising its forthcoming release and badmouthing Spirit until they were banned. Have we got anyway of referencing its release which proves it was distributed, even if from a reliable poster on a forum? If we can't prove it was distributed, it no longer becomes an album ;)

cheers Leipzigger98 (talk) 17:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm a member of leonalewisfansite.co.uk, my information came from the forums there. Anyway I merged the entire article into Leona Lewis after my first reply and I'll even remove the bit about it being released seeing as we don't have a reliable source for it, and I'll remove it from the infobox and discography section too. ^anemone│_projectors 18:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

User: Gassyguy

I noticed you said you are "watching" gassyguy's userpage for automated messages. He has two images that are slated for deletion due to a lack of a fair use rationale, so I made an attempt to follow the instructions to keep them. I'm not sure I have done this correctly, so if you are watching his stuff (I assume that's what you meant by watching) would you be so kind as to make sure I did so properly? Thank you for your time. 64.230.43.189 (talk) 22:04, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Actually I forgot that GassyGuy wasn't around until a recent edit to his talk page, so I hadn't checked the images. You did a good job, but one of them was already fixed by someone else so you didn't need to add a rationale - I've reverted you on that one. The other one was perfect, but you left in the invalid rationale template so I've removed that. :) ^anemone│_projectors 22:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Best Kept Secret (Leona Lewis album).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Best Kept Secret (Leona Lewis album).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi there

Welcome to Wikipedia, I hope you enjoy your stay little one. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 23:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't get it. I've been here since June 2006. ^anemone│_projectors 23:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Socrates knew that the only that he knew was nothing. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 23:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I think he was wrong. ^anemone│_projectors 23:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

You would not be alone in that, in any case, I welcome you to the fold. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 00:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

The Wikipedia fold? ^anemone│_projectors 13:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Being in the "fold" doesn't sound all that good at all! it reminds me of Star Wars when they're stuck in that trash compactor in the Death Star, hmmm... in any case, again, welcome! and I hope you don't get crushed! -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 00:11, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Why are you welcoming me?! ^anemone│_projectors 00:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Because I am the Librarian oO. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

That doesn't make sense. ^anemone│_projectors 00:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Of course it does! Now, if you need any help; ie: Library services, please let me know! But I must get on.. Welcome, for the final time. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 01:19, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

You are so confusing. I was welcomed in 2006, I don't need welcoming in 2008. That's all I wanted to say. ^anemone│_projectors 14:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, AnemoneProjectors, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Majorly (talk) 15:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Marjory. Wikipedia is scary no longer. ^anemone│_projectors 15:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Lulz! I can't believe someone else welcomed you too! -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 22:27, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I can't believe you did. ^anemone│_projectors 22:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

London Meetup

Hey! The next London Wikipedia Meetup is February 09, 2008, at 6pm. Hope to see you then, Poeloq (talk) 22:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh that was quick. Thanks. I'll see who else is going before I decide but at least everyone will know well in advance. ^anemone│_projectors 22:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Lucky You!

Hi there, I wonder if I could grab your expertise. I've been working on Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps, which you might know started its seventh series yesterday. One of the main characters, Jonny, has been written out but his section in List of Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps characters refers to events going way back to the beginning. Another user wants to move his section into a new "Former characters" section, and I am resisting, on the basis that there are few characters in the series, he is central to it, and it makes no sense to me to have a separate section considering that this will probably be the last series anyway. I see Eastenders characters get moved into a complete new article, but "Two Pints" is a lot smaller in scope. Having failed to find any guidelines for this, would you mind letting me have your opinion? Thanks. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 05:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, my opinion is that he doesn't need to be moved to a new section, as he's still a main character, even if he's not in episodes being aired at the moment. So keep him where he is. ^anemone│_projectors 11:11, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Much obliged to you. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 12:52, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Subpages

Just a short reply for the message at Talk:Ronnie Mitchell/Sandbox. I think that only applies in "user" space. I think if it's a test it should not be in main article space. So even the talk page should get the chop? See CSD 2. Or at least that's how it looks to me. I was looking things up and about to ask the creator of the article about it but since it's now gone problem solved. Cheers. Sting_au Talk 00:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh and I should have added that Ronnie Mitchell already exists. Sting_au Talk 00:08, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

WP:SP says "Writing drafts of major article revisions [isn't allowed], e.g [[Example Article/Temp]] in the main namespace, as you can get there accidentally using special:randompage -- write these in the talk namespace, e.g. [[Talk:Example Article/Temp]]." We're re-writing the article so it's allowed. ^anemone│_projectors 00:10, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh I get it now. Thanks for the explanation. I was concerned after I marked it as patrolled and thought I should look into it further. If I see something like that in future I'll probably just do a rename and alert the creator. Cheers, Sting_au Talk 00:32, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah if you find any in future just make sure they're in the talk namespace and not the main one. I didn't even know drafts had to go in the talk namespace until after your first message so thanks for bringing it up! ^anemone│_projectors 09:09, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi

I don't want to jinx it but I should have internet access at home sometime this week, and then I'll be back for good :) I'm out of practice though, I keep forgetting to type [[]] and ~~~~ and do edit summaries etc! -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 15:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi:

Last night, I added a link to the Eastenders main Wikipedia page, that shows my blog commentary on Eastenders episodes. This was removed by AnemoneProjects (maybe inadvertently or not), and I'm not sure if there is a problem. I 've added it back again, but please let me know if there is a problem.

Also, I 'd be interestd in joining the Eastenders Wiki Project.

Thanks, Ecnirpjh —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecnirpjh (talk • contribs) 02:02, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Your own personal blog does not belong in Wikipedia. See WP:EL. ^anemone│_projectors 02:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Typo redirect Andy DeMize (drummer)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Andy DeMize (drummer), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Andy DeMize (drummer) is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Andy DeMize (drummer), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

That's what I get for testing in SineBot's sandbox!!! ^anemone│_projectors 00:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

ROFL, I was reading the comment thinking, "who is this idiot?" do they think that The Projector is 4 years old? I gotta get me one of those bots. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 00:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Are you stalking me? ^anemone│_projectors 13:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm not stalking you! I just have a lot of time to Wiki because I have a very very dull deskjob =) -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 22:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SmileLilyAllen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SmileLilyAllen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Robbie Jackson

Hi, can you protect this page please? some anon keeps deleting an image. Gungadin♦ 22:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

If they do it again I'm going to block them for 3rr ^anemone│_projectors 22:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Can't say that would upset me too much :) Gungadin♦ 22:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Blocking is much more satisfying :) ^anemone│_projectors 22:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Than protecting, that is. The same user just vandalised Dot Branning. I think she's been through enough lately! ^anemone│_projectors 22:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

I didnt realise he was vandalising other pages. Thanks for taking care of him, although he'll probably be back with an new ip.Gungadin♦ 22:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Seems unlikely as it was the same ip as 2 days ago who removed the image. I only blocked for 31 hours though cos it's like, the rules or something. ^anemone│_projectors 22:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

They removed it again last night, I reverted. -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 08:54, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

I noticed. ^anemone│_projectors 11:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

(And again) Can't you block them again? -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 11:57, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

I can block them when they make more than three reverts in a period of 24 hours. ^anemone│_projectors 12:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

They have. -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

And that's why I've already blocked them. ^anemone│_projectors 12:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Why

Why did you revert my edit, it wasnt vandalism, fool! —Preceding unsigned comment added by TomIsFromHull (talk • contribs) 13:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Because it wasn't needed. I didn't say it was vandalism. Please also see WP:NPA. ^anemone│_projectors 14:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

characters

do you know anything about the characters I labeled as androids --Gabby the kitty (talk) 03:46, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Stop asking stupid questions. ^anemone│_projectors 11:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

MATTHEW CRANE aka YOUNG MAESTRO

Hi,

You have put tags on my page and there seems to be a problem or dispute of some kind and I do not understand it. Please could you be specific for me on the "grey" areas so that I can put them right.

Here is the link:

www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Crane

Thank you for your help.

Best Wishes,

Matthew Crane. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.67.210.3 (talk) 15:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

First if all, if you are the subject of the article, you should read Wikipedia:Autobiography and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. As for the problems with the article, a few examples are the lack of sources (WP:V), "He recently collaborated with two of the UK's finest Rappers" is a personal point of view, as is "Two high profile music channels" amongst other things. "His total viewing audience, so far, exceeds over 100 million viewers in the UK alone." makes it sound as though people watched the shows simply because he was on them. Basically, the whole article needs sourcing and rewriting. ^anemone│_projectors 15:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi again,

If you have the time going to all the different pages on Wikipedia, perhaps you could spend a few minutes editing mine to make it unbiased. Some things that I might consider unbiased, are in fact, biased. I value your input, as all I want is to have my page on Wikipedia without any problems.

Then any statements outstanding which need sourcing, I will put in reputable sources from the National and local press, as I have hundreds of these to back them up.

I look forward to your input,

Best Wishes,

Matthew Crane. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.242.54.245 (talk) 20:58, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll try but I can't promise anything. ^anemone│_projectors 21:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind that I'm removing quite a chunk of information, especially the "celebrity reviews" section. And also, please don't be offended if the article ends up being listed for deletion at some point. I'm just not sure that you're quite notable just yet. ^anemone│_projectors 21:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your reverting my edit to Autofellatio

I believe we may have a misunderstanding of what the term "blank edit" means as the way you wrote your edit summary and the very fact that you felt like making that edit seems to indicate that you think I had vandalized the page.

However, according to my understanding (though now I can't find the page I found this information on), the definition of a "blank edit" (as opposed to "blanking a page") means that the edit I made I had no actual effect on the content of the page. The reason I made the edit was to provide a better edit summary than I had before.. I checked the revision page and it didn't look like my edit affected anything. Could you please explain your intention in reverting that edit to me?

EDIT: Oh wait.. I see now. There was some text at the bottom added.. That's odd. I don't know how that got there. I must have pressed one of the wiki markup buttons by accident.. I swear that wasn't intentional.. I did preview the page before I pressed the Save Page button.. It's really odd. Repku (talk) 02:23, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah normally I wouldn't revert a blank edit as I have made them myself sometimes just to sort out an edit summary... I guess you pressed the redirect icon, which is why I undid your "blank edit" :) I guess I should have explained with an edit summary myself! ^anemone│_projectors 09:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Tedious sock

Hi, you seem to be on WJH1992's case regarding his tedious trail of sockpuppets, so I thought I'd leave User:Babybubler90 to you. Pyrope 21:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Very tedious! I ddn't make the connection between them, but you're probably right. I'll give him a chance this time. He was offered help but rejected it. He obviously wants to help but doesn't seem interested in learning the rules. ^anemone│_projectors 22:10, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

From my previous interactions with him, and detailed study of his edit history, I suspect that he may have some form of learning difficulty. Pyrope 14:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Possibly. I've reverted loads of his edits today. All of them, in fact. ^anemone│_projectors 15:04, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Heartbeat(Scouting for girls song)

An editor has nominated Heartbeat(Scouting for girls song), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heartbeat(Scouting for girls song) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:44, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Bot behaviour is strange. I know it's a relisted AFD but I already commented! ^anemone│_projectors 15:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Babybubler90

The ratio of correct edits to incorrect is pretty poor (as I'm sure you know). Why can't the IP address be blocked? I haven't followed the case, but sure seems like it's crying out for something more than just accepting it. Maybe someone would mentor the guy. Tvoz |talk 21:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I think most of the edits are in good faith... -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 22:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes they are made in good faith. I don't know about blocking an IP address of someone who's logged in, isn't the IP automatically blocked anyway? Someone offered to mentor him before but he never took up the offer. ^anemone│_projectors 22:20, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

The edits may be in good faith - I can't tell - but the editor doesn't seem to grasp what he's told about edit summaries and preview, leaving a mess for others to clean up. There were very few usable edits - that can't be right. At some point I think some intervention is called for. Tvoz |talk 08:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Agreed, though I don't know what I can do. ^anemone│_projectors 09:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Lauren Cooper

Thanks for your help, regarding User:Babybubler90's edits to the Lauren Cooper article. Despite all of the reverts, the user has still persisted in changing the tense in the opening paragraphs. I've now reverted and left another note on the user's talk page. Eagle Owl (talk) 10:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Good luck with that! ^anemone│_projectors 10:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you help

With this Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Trampikey 2. What do I do now he's accepted? lol Gungadin 20:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/nominate#What to do if you are nominated by someone else ^anemone│_projectors 20:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

So I dont have to do anything except add his edit stats to the talk page? How do I do that? Sorry, i'm lame at this.Gungadin 20:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I dunno! Erm, follow the link to Wannabe Kate's stats thing on the talk page and copy and paste all the information in place of {{{2|}}} ^anemone│_projectors 20:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

My answers are crap compared to everyone else's... I'm not good at writing about myself... Anything (good) you can see that I missed out? -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 20:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks AP (edit: Looks like someone's done it for me, yay!!!). Trampikey, look through some successful RFAs and see if they inspire you.Gungadin 20:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Mexican Hot 100

Hi! I see you flagged this as a potential hoax. I'm reasonably sure that User:Password16, who created it, is serial hoaxer User:Maneisis returned under another account - see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive335#Dubious edits by User:Maneisis for my previous investigations of his long-term hoax edits. Password16 seems to be editing on the same topics, showing the same patterns of behaviour, and the same complete refusal to ever discuss anything on any talk page. --Stormie (talk) 10:24, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

That's interesting. He's added references to the Mexican Hot 100 on many articles. Would you like to deal with him? I've never dealt with hoaxes or hoaxers. ^anemone│_projectors 11:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I have listed the Mexican Hot 100 articles on AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mexican Hot 100. Assuming there is consensus to delete, I'll clean up the references to them and, to be honest, I think it's time to block this account along with all the other hoax accounts I believe to have been run by the same person. --Stormie (talk) 03:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a Million

Emmerdale did have books but I doubt they were as popular as the EE ones and probably harder to track down. Conquistador2k6 8 February 11:16 (UTC)

A Moment like This (Leona Lewis Single)

You may be interested in editing articles related to Leona Lewis. I just find find her and Kelly Clarkson both released a same-titled single called "A Moment like This", but the original article A Moment like This is just describing the single of Kelly Clarkson. So I make a disambig page and create the new article A Moment like This (Leona Lewis Single). But I'm not familiar with Leona Lewis's discography, so the new article contains almost no content. May you help me to improve it? Thanks for your help.　　s19991002~-~Message 04:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh dear. ^anemone│_projectors 14:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheFeeling-FillMyLittleWorld7Inch.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TheFeeling-FillMyLittleWorld7Inch.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Portion used on FURs

I notice you removed what I put under portion in the FURs. I dont get the point of that field, but I was just going by this conversation about it on the template talkpage Template talk:Non-free use rationale#Portion used. Is that wrong? Gungadin 21:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah, I'm sorry about that. I blame edit conflicts. I didn't really notice that field, I've always left it blank. Normally I would incorporate your changes into my edit if there was a conflict. ^anemone│_projectors 21:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Olivia Grant

Thanks for your question about the two Olivia Grants. See reply on my talk page, and sorry it was a bit slow in coming. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:14, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

About your profile page

Can I ask how you made your page? The userboxes on the right looks good, and I would like to add it to my lame looking page. Fingers crossed that you can help me.

Chaubaby—Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaubaby (talk • contribs) 18 February 2008, 09:02 (UTC)

Hi, to get your userboxes in a line on the right hand side, just add the template {{boxboxtop}} to your page, followed by any userboxes you want to use, then at the end of the list, add {{boxboxbottom}}. Hope that helps. ^anemone│_projectors 09:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

thanks for that. now, how do i align the boxes, and the text on the same line?

sorry about this, im new to wiki editing, and i know nothing!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaubaby (talk • contribs) 10:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I've done it for you. ^anemone│_projectors 13:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

wow!!

That was a surprise. I wasn't expecting that! Thanks alot :D

^chau│_baby —Preceding comment was added at 05:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. Could you possibly not steal my signature? ^anemone│_projectors 07:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

what if....

i change the colours, and move the subscipt to super, and vice versa? is that ok? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaubaby (talk • contribs) 13:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

It would still be similar to mine but I guess I don't own my signature. I'm guessing that people who know me will instantly recognise it as me when they see it, so I don't want there to be any confusion. Also it took a lot of effort to get the formatting right. ^anemone│_projectors 13:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

better.....?

Chaubaby-=-=-Chaubaby

That's ok now. Do you know how to actually sign a page properly, and edit your signature in your preferences? If not, I'll explain it to you. ^anemone│_projectors 14:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

no idea mate

Chaubaby-=-=-Chaubaby —Preceding comment was added at 14:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

To sign a talk page, all you have to do is type 4 tildes (~~~~). To properly edit your signature, click on "my preferences" at the top of any page. Tick the "raw signature" box and where it says "signature", put in the signature you want. The message below might also explain it. ^anemone│_projectors 14:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

this is a test

i'll delete once i am done [[User:Chaubaby|<font color="red"><b>Chaubaby</b></font>]]<b>-=-=-</b>[[User talk:Chaubaby|<font color="blue"><b>Chaubaby</b></font>]] (talk) 14:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

i did, and it looks like this... [[User:Chaubaby|<font color="red"><b>Chaubaby</b></font>]]<b>-=-=-</b>[[User talk:Chaubaby|<font color="blue"><b>Chaubaby</b></font>]] (talk) 14:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Make sure the "raw signatures" box is ticked. ^anemone│_projectors 15:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

so, is this better?

fingers crossed Chaubaby-=-=-Chaubaby 16:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes it worked. Well done. ^anemone│_projectors 20:11, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Joan Hooley

Hi, would u mind looking her up on the birth certificate site you sometimes use please? A newspaper is saying she was born in Jamaica, but this says she was born in Manchester [1] Gungadin 23:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I'll see if I can do it tomorrow sometime, as I appear to have fallen asleep in front of my computer and I am totally knackered :) ^anemone│_projectors 00:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Socks of User:WJH1992

Hi, I noticed that you have dealt with a number of the socks of the above banned user. I wonder if User:Worcestershire'man might be another. They have edited the same articles to insert the same information, and appear to not be new to wikipedia in their level of expertise. I don't really know how to deal with these sorts of things, so I wonder if you could give your thoughts. Thanks, Benea (talk) 15:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

I thought the same, but I couldn't see any edits that were exactly alike so I didn't do anything. The only way I know how to deal with it is by blocking, but they always come back. ^anemone│_projectors 15:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

I know what you mean. User:William.JHowes, one of his puppets edited Denise Wicks and was reverted, then User:Worcestershire'man comes in, replaces the information and adds a 'do not remove' tag. Given that the puppet master has previously indicated a connection with Worcestershire makes it I think beyond reasonable doubt. The two also edited Solway Harvester within a day of each other, which is where I ran into him. I assumed that he was a newbie editor and didn't understand how the templates worked, then didn't know how or why he should talk about it, but it now seems like its disruptive editing. Having him blocked would make that situation simpler. Kind regards, Benea (talk) 15:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes you're right, it is the same user. ^anemone│_projectors 15:55, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Genres

Hi, is there any significance in the order of genres listed in articles? Specifically Leona Lewis and her related pages. They're being swapped about practically daily. Just curious. ^anemone│_projectors 00:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi! As far as I know there are no guidelines regarding order of genres, it's just that I personally like to list them in order of importance, I hope that's not a bother for you or anyone else. Funk Junkie (talk) 19:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

That's fair enough. I'm not at all bothered what order they're in, it just bothers me that other people can't agree. ^anemone│_projectors 20:11, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. I notice there are users who keep swapping the order of genres and don't even bother lowercasing them; I hope it doesn't turn into an edit war or something. Funk Junkie (talk) 20:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Actually I would say Leona is more soul than R&B. It's totally POV, really. I think the people who keep adding R&B to "Footprints in the Sand" are totally crazy though :) ^anemone│_projectors 20:25, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

To be honest I'm not that familiar with Leona's music, only "Bleeding Love", which I consider to be a contemporary R&B-backed pop song. As for "Footprints in the Sand", I think it's quite much of piano pop. Funk Junkie (talk) 20:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh right. I'm not really that familiar with genres, espcially the really specific ones, though I like the sound of neo-soul. Of course, she's also done rock, with the Avril Lavigne song "I Will Be", but that seems to have been overlooked... ^anemone│_projectors 21:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Character page merge request

May I request that you merge the Jo Stiles and Jo Sugden articles together to retain the editing history from the Jo Stiles one? Given her recent surname change, a new article has been made and the old one redirected, but I know wiki standard is usually to move to article to retain its history. I know you're more involved in editing on the eastenders articles, but given your input in soap-articles generally, I thought this may not be too much of a problem? Cheers. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

 Done ^anemone│_projectors 09:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Mea Maxima Culpa. I'll move rather than redirect in future whenever someone with an existing article (re)marries, is adopted or reverts to Maiden name, I guess it was one lazy-arse move on my part. Guess I got caught eventually! Conquistador2k6 00:38 21 February, 2008 (UTC)

...the welcome

I took it from someone else's page purely so I had the quick links on my page. Haha!! Thanks for the welcome though. :D _chau\/^baby 14:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I guessed that was what you did as someone else's signature was on it. I did mean to welcome you the other day but I didn't get around to it! ^anemone│_projectors 14:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

also, about the Katie Melua pic, and wiki commons

Thanks for the feedback. I am only now just understanding 'pedia. I might leave it a while until I properly use 'commons. :D _chau\/^baby 14:24, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Your photos are really good. If you ever see Leona Lewis, please take a photo as we need a new one for her article! ^anemone│_projectors 14:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Leona Lewis picture request

Funnily enough mate, I do have a solitary picture of Leona. There was a 'do she was attending in January at Covent Garden. As I always have my camera with me, I just had enough time to get one frame. Quality isn't my usual standard, but at least it is more up to date than the current one you have. I'll give you the link to the picture here, as I notice I cannot edit her page.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Leona_lewis_coventgarden_002.jpg _chau\/^baby 15:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You used it!! :D _chau\/^baby 15:39, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

future images

I'm watching the rugby at the mo, so I can't do a full list. Let me know what articles you need pictures for, and I'll see if I can help. Deal? _chau\/^baby 15:44, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The only other article I've tried to find an image for is Will Young. There's loads of articles that need free images, I was just thinking if you ever came across them and you happened to have one, you could add it. What about actors who are in EastEnders? ^anemone│_projectors 15:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I have nothing for Will Young. I can say that without even looking. I think I have some stuff for Eastenders. Anyone inparticular? _chau\/^baby 16:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No, none in particular really. ^anemone│_projectors 16:40, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I take it you have a 'thing' for Leona? ;) _chau\/^baby 15:47, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah I'm a big fan. Her page is the one I've worked on most within Wikipedia. ^anemone│_projectors 15:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Eastenders

Looking at the current characters list, I have nothing that would help. I have however got a frame of Louisa Lytton. I've already added it, if you want to see. _chau\/^baby 16:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

That's cool. I'm more involved with EastEnders characters than actors, but it was just a thought. Any of Wendy Richard? ^anemone│_projectors 16:42, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I have nothing of Wendy Richard. Where do we stand in posting pics of characters? Are we allowed screenshots of shows? If its allowed, then it would be good for me. I have about 2gb of various screenshots. _chau\/^baby 17:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The characters already have images. We are allowed screenshots under fair use laws, it can get complicated if you're not familiar. But yeah, all the characters from EastEnders already have images. ^anemone│_projectors 17:15, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Disa O'Brien doesn't! -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 17:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah. And R&R (EastEnders) needs one too. ^anemone│_projectors 17:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Leona Typo

It's a typo. It is meant to be January, 2008. My mistake. _chau\/^baby 16:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My homepage

Evening. Can you let me know what you think, and also check if the links work, please? _chau\/^baby 21:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

It's fine. I've delinked the "did you know?" bit as you don't need a link to template talk:Did you know. ^anemone│_projectors 21:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm slowly getting the hang of this wiki lark. :D _chau\/^baby 21:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Lacey Amelia Turner

Sorry to bother you again with this. Can you check out where she was born? ive seen several things saying London, but she grew up in Herts. The article says she was born in herts. Can you check for me when you have time please? Gungadin 14:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Her birth was registered in April 1988 in the district of Hendon. ^anemone│_projectors 14:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

North London then, thankyou.Gungadin 14:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

WJH is back

User:Manx boy -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 22:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. ^anemone│_projectors 22:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

And User talk:Kiddy'lad :) -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 19:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I know. ^anemone│_projectors 19:43, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Michelle Ryan

I trawled my archive, and found a frame of Michelle Ryan from a couple of years back. Just thought I'd let you know, as you asked me about Eastenders pictures. _chau\/^baby 14:33, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

She looks very bionic indeed. ^anemone│_projectors 21:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Hayden Panettiere picture vote

I have put myself up for nomination!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Picture_peer_review/Hayden_Panettiere

Give me your opinion!!!

_chau\/^baby 22:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

You haven't followed step 3 at Wikipedia:Picture peer review. I'll keep the review page on my watchlist but I'm not really in a position to comment on the image myself. ^anemone│_projectors 22:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

I have done step 3 now. why cannot you comment?

_chau\/^baby 22:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Mainly because I'm not familiar with the criteria for featured images, and I'm not that interested in finding out! :) ^anemone│_projectors 22:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Thats an honest answer!! hahaha! :D _chau\/^baby 23:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

EastEnders on hold (GA sweep)

I have reassessed this article as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. We are currently revisiting all listed Good articles in an effort to ensure that they continue to meet the Good article criteria.

In reviewing the article, I came across some issues that may need to be addressed; I have left a detailed summary on the article's talk page. As a result I have put EastEnders's GA status on hold. This will remain in place for a week or so before a final decision is taken as to the article's status.

I've left this notice here because, from the article history, you have been a significant contributor. If you no longer edit this article, please accept my apologies and feel free to disregard this message ;)

Regards, EyeSerene^TALK 13:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:EastEndersAreHere1985.jpg

DIdn't notice it referred to two articles - apologies :) Stephenb (Talk) 10:09, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Liwyc.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Liwyc.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Paulinejoetorchwood.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:Paulinejoetorchwood.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Kieron Hobbs

Can you protect this article please? -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Why? ^anemone│_projectors 23:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

The spelling of his name either keeps getting changed to Kieran or people keep changing his last name to O'Dowd. -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 11:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I've checked every edit for this month - the article was originally spelled Kieran, then it was corrected and since then it's been changed to O'Dowd once. I'm not going to protect it for one incorrect change. However, I will keep it on my watchlist for a while to make sure. ^anemone│_projectors 12:24, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

It was previously on the list of minor Hollyoaks characters that it kept getting changed and also on the Hollyoaks cast list. -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 14:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

That doesn't really warrant protection of Kieron Hobbs. ^anemone│_projectors 15:08, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Minors

Matthew (James Hoogland) and Mr. Ackroyd (Alex Avery (actor)) added :). Sorry for late response. -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 15:09, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Ta! ^anemone│_projectors 15:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Dashes

What's the difference between all the dashes and when should they be used? The only one I have on my keyboard is this one: - Thanks. -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 22:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:DASH has all the answers. Basically, the en dash (–) is for linking dates, but if there's only one date (like in a character who hasn't left yet), you use the em dash (—). Below the edit box you should see "Insert: – — … ° ≈ ≠ ≤ ≥ ± − × ÷ ← → · §" and lots more besides. Clicking on the symbol you want will insert it into the edit box at the point where the cursor is. ^anemone│_projectors 22:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Leona Lewis

Hi,

Thanks for your messages.

The Leona article is chock full of useless, excessive material that really belongs in the pages of magazines such as Heat and NOT in Wikipedia.

Information relating to the type of dog she owns, the names of her siblings, etc. are wholly unimportant.

Please don't fill Wikipedia with fanboy trivia.

You should stick to SIGNIFICANT events, not useless information about wearing a dress or switching on street lights.

She's a SINGER and NOT the second coming of Christ.

Please keep the article concise and tidy in future.

(note - I am not done with my edits yet) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scarfy (talk • contribs) 23:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The Gregory Triplets

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article The Gregory Triplets, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Could you look at something for me?

I was going to handle this myself, but I bet you know more about the image policies than I do. You had tagged 3 images uploaded by User:Holiday56 as being replaceable: Image:Carly Smithson.jpg, Image:David Cook.jpg and Image:Kristy Lee Cook.jpg. Holiday56 changed the replaceable field to say that the pictures aren't replaceable because the event is over. Well the problem is that nothing in the policy states that the images have to be from the same event. Also, we have several free pictures on the site that come from the same event (Image:ChikezieEze.jpg, Image:DavidHernandez.jpg and 6 others). And you know they can't be the only ones that exist. Anyway. Could you take a look? I admit that I could be wrong, but I don't think I am. :) --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 11:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Gregory Triplets

An editor has nominated The Gregory Triplets, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gregory Triplets and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:A Moment like This (Leona).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:A Moment like This (Leona).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - April 2008

The above newsletter was delivered by an automatic bot because you are registered on the WikiProject Big Brother spamlist. Please feel free to remove yourself if you do not wish to receive these messages anymore.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 13:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of UK Physical Singles Chart

An editor has nominated UK Physical Singles Chart, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UK Physical Singles Chart and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter, March 2008

	The Space-Time Telegraph
	The WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter
	Issue 1	March 2008
Project News We have five new participants: Sm9800, Seanor3, T saston, Type 40, Jammy0002. One editor has left the project: StuartDD. The Doctor Who portal has expanded to increase the number of selected stories to 33. Articles of note New featured articles None New featured article candidates Voyage of the Damned (Doctor Who) (FAC) New good articles Dalek (Doctor Who episode) Astrid Peth Delisted articles None Proposals A proposal for changing the layout of the episode pages is under way here. A discussion about the formatting of the cast lists in episode pages is under way here. A discussion to move United Nations Intelligence Taskforce to UNIT is under way here. News The Torchwood project has become a task-force under the project's scope. The Torchwood series 2 finale airs on 4th April, and the 4th series of Doctor Who will start to air on 5th April. For the Doctor Who project, Sceptre (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC) You have received this letter because you are on the newsletter recipients list. To opt-out, please remove your name.

London Meetup - April 13th

London Wikipedia Meetup number 8 is happening next Sunday lunchtime (April 13th 1pm) in Holborn. Come along!

-- Harry Wood (talk) 11:22, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Footprints in the Sand (video).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Footprints in the Sand (video).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:28, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Better in Time video.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Better in Time video.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

London Meetups - Sunday May 11th

We're hoping to have regular meetups in London. If you're interested, keep an eye on Wikipedia:Meetup/London. The next one is on Sunday May 11th Wikipedia:Meetup/London 9 in Holborn. -- Harry Wood (talk) 11:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - May 2008

The above newsletter was delivered by an automatic bot because you are registered on the WikiProject Big Brother spamlist. Please feel free to remove yourself if you do not wish to receive these messages anymore.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 10:38, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Better in Time video.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Better in Time video.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi

I notice from the history that you have protected the Gareth Gates page and I was wondering if you could remove that protection in order for me to update Gareth's page on his behalf. If you could let me know about this ASAP I would be very grateful.

Thanks in advance

MC

AnemoneProjectors is not active on Wikipedia at the moment. -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 11:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Leona Lewis on The X Factor

Hi AnenomeProjectors. I've just made this article and User:Wiki edit Jonny has nominated the article for deletion here already. Rather than delete it, could we all collaborate to improve it please? I'm sure there's something in it that's worth salvaging. Leonapedia (talk) 13:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Better in Time video.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Better in Time video.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Walk on By/Walk On By

I left a message on the talk page for "Walk on By", but there's been no response, so I'll leave a message here...

Since the word "on" is not used as a preposition in this title (i.e., what is a "by" and how does one walk on it?), shouldn't it properly be "Walk On By"? I moved this page last year, and it appears that you moved it back. Dewelar (talk) 19:21, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:It's All for You.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:It's All for You.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:33, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 19:28, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Typo redirect Template:Emmerdale character 2/doc

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Emmerdale character 2/doc, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Emmerdale character 2/doc is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Emmerdale character 2/doc, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 10:40, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Bleeding Love (video).jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Bleeding Love (video).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 15:08, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Bohemian Like You.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Bohemian Like You.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 19:54, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:A Moment like This (Leona).ogg)

Thanks for uploading Image:A Moment like This (Leona).ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC)