Andrew93833

Your submission at Articles for creation: András Nemescsói (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:András Nemescsói and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:András Nemescsói, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Drover's Wife (talk) 10:52, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Andrew93833! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Drover's Wife (talk) 10:52, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

As I said at the time, the article needs to cite coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to demonstrate notability for Wikipedia, so it isn't just that there are issues with the current sources but that they are not close to sufficient.

As for the current sources: #1 doesn't mention the subject at all, #2 is a 404, #3 is his page on his work website, #4 is a reliable source but doesn't contribute much to notability (just being a good lawyer doesn't mean one needs a Wikipedia article), #5 is authored by the subject, #6 doesn't mention him at all and is also a directory listing so not an appropriate source regardless, #7 and #8 are acceptable cites for verifying those two specific facts but contributes nothing to notability (the world has many lawyers, and many of them sit on boards), and #9 verifies that he wrote a book chapter but also contributes nothing about the significance of that. The sources that don't mention him are especially pointless.

Essentially, it needs to establish significance beyond himself, his employer, and other organisations that he does stuff for: if no one has ever written about him who wasn't associated with him beyond the massive Legal 500 page (nearly all of whom won't be considered notable either), this tends to suggest that he's not notable enough to be in an encyclopedia. The Drover's Wife (talk) 20:49, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: András Nemescsói (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:András Nemescsói and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:András Nemescsói, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Worldbruce (talk) 14:55, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:András Nemescsói concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:András Nemescsói, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:András Nemescsói

Hello, Andrew93833. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "András Nemescsói".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 22:32, 25 March 2020 (UTC)