Your submission at Articles for creation: BitKan (September 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 14:25, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Andrew.karpenko, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 14:25, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

05:45:17, 11 September 2016 review of submission by Andrew.karpenko

edit


Dear 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR ! Would you please kindly tell me the exact reason of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BitKan declining? Bitcoin is a young and rapidly (as almost everyting in today`s IT) developing branch. Mostly it is covered in specific media (same as much of scientific topics, by the way). Opening the first company in the List of bitcoin companies , I didn`t see much more references as my article has. Vewing all the list, I found that only few from there were mentioned in USUAL "reliable, independent non-trade media". And even for them mentioning was sometimes made in Blogs. Anyway, our goal is to make the Wikipedia beter. If you still think that the article doesn`t have to be here, please kindly describe the details.

Welcome to wikipedia! The coverage in the cyrptocurrency trade magazines is a good start. But not enough to pass company notability yet. Once the company/app is covered in reliable, independent non-trade media, then it might pass notability tests. While you wait, why not browse and help out at the Cryptocurrency task force. Also feel free to post on the Help Desk. Happy editing. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 07:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

15:56:41, 11 September 2016 review of submission by Andrew.karpenko

edit


Dear 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR! Would you please kindly explain me, which exactly sources from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/37coins for example, are more reliable than the sources in https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BitKan ?

Greetings! Sure - the main difference is that 37coins article has a reference from a significant writeup in Tech in Asia, a news site that is not a crypto-trade magazine. But Draft:BitKan only has sources from crypto trade magazines. Hope that helps! -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 18:18, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:BitKan company logo black.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:BitKan company logo black.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Majora (talk) 04:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply