Nomination of Nselaa Ward for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nselaa Ward is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nselaa Ward until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page 20:28, 8 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Self Published Sources edit

Hi, @AndreaPerry22:. Please review WP:BLP, WP:RS, and WP:V. If your edits to Nselaa Ward do not comply with these policies/guidelines, they may be quickly removed by other editors. --Jahaza (talk) 23:54, 8 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Circular references edit

  Thanks for contributing to the article Nselaa Ward. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 01:48, 9 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Serial Number 54129. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nselaa Ward without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ——SN54129 06:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Nselaa Ward. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. ——SN54129 06:34, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello AndreaPerry22. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Nselaa Ward, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AndreaPerry22. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AndreaPerry22|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. John from Idegon (talk) 19:44, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse! edit

 
Hello! AndreaPerry22, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! John from Idegon (talk) 19:48, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply