Andrea105 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
No evidence provided. Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Confidential_evidence prohibits administrators from blocking without on-wiki justification. Andrea105 (talk) 04:03, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your block was based on a strong behavioral similarity to a banned user, backed up by a confirmed checkuser finding performed by myself and another checkuser. Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Andrea105 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
And it took you over a month to discover this -- only because I made it somewhat sporting by using the same ISP, user agent, and a BRFA filed over a week ago that's basically a paraphrased copy of Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Erik9bot 8. At least Matthew Bisanz is paying attention... You do realize that I can simply change ISPs, avoid obvious giveaways like installing a javascript tool on my first day, avoid the "third rail" of wiki-politics like reverting/requesting blocks for personal attacks/incivility, etc...
Decline reason:
Yes, it's firmly established that Wikipedia does not have strong means of preventing determined users from editing the site. If you quietly return, nobody is likely to know or care (as you've discovered repeatedly, actually). As you note, the first month was pretty easy-going. You even got a(nother) bot! But where you tripped up (again) was getting involved in the more political and contentious parts of the wiki. That's when people become more suspicious. Want to contribute productively? Fine, nobody can or should stop you. But that's not why you were blocked, that's not why you were banned, and that's not why all of this keeps happening. You realize this, I know you do. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
sorry