Andra1ex

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Andre🚐 12:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Advice

If you wish to tell people not to use Wikipedia that is your choice but read WP:NOTDUMB, the threat will not get you your way. Also read wp:soapbox. Slatersteven (talk) Slatersteven (talk) 14:11, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

I skimmed the first link. "Appeals to logic (which is subjective anyway) will also not succeed". First if logic is not a prove for you then there is nothing to talk about. Logic is the foundation of math, physics, and the rest of science. Logic is the core of any proof - not references, quotes, and authoritative persons. Second, logic is not subjective - logic is objective, otherwise math would have two opposite theorems, which is does not have. Andra1ex (talk) 00:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

The statement that I am going to advise people on which part of Wikipedia to use and which to avoid is not a threat - I don't know why you feel this way, and it is really not that important - it is just a statement of what is going to happen. And it is my right to do so. Andra1ex (talk) 00:58, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Andra1ex, what forms of evidence would you consider sufficient to prove Russian interference in the elections? Who would have the expertise to determine such things? -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 14:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

International court or a United Nations commission would suffice. Andra1ex (talk) 00:48, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Multiple people were convicted in US courts. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 01:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

1. What for exactly were these people convicted?

2. Provide links to the court documents.

3. Provide explanation of why these convictions prove that Russia as a country interfered in the elections.

4. Provide links to documents proving that the international organizations agree with the conclusions of these cases. Andra1ex (talk) 21:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Without you providing reliable sources to back up your claims, we cannot accept your opinion as a reliable source. We have multiple articles that cover the subject of Russian interference in the U.S. elections from many angles, and they are backed by thousands of RS. Here are some of them:

• 2016 United States election leaks
• Links between Trump associates and Russian officials and spies
• Donald Trump's disclosures of classified information
• Hillary Clinton email controversy
• Cyberwarfare by Russia
• 2017–2018 Department of Justice metadata seizures
• Democratic National Committee cyber attacks
• Democratic National Committee v. Russian Federation
• Dismissal of James Comey
• Foreign electoral intervention
• Foreign policy of Donald Trump (2015–16)
• Podesta emails
• Russia–United States relations
• Russian espionage in the United States
• Russian interference (2016)
• Russian interference (2018)
• Russian interference (2020)
• Timelines related to Donald Trump and Russian interference in United States elections
• Trump Tower meeting

Have fun. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 15:26, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Is the quality of all these articles on the same level as of the article beeing discussed? Andra1ex (talk) 21:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC)