Amelija2

Welcome!

Hello, Amelija2! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Dougweller (talk) 16:20, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your concern about personal attacks

You asked an editor to avoid personal attacks, and then wrote "Your ego is out of control and you should be banned as an editor. Are you a member of the Church of Scientology, by chance?". That's pretty clearly a personal attack. Dougweller (talk) 16:46, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Notification

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Platonics has been opened, where you are mentioned. Edward321 (talk) 01:15, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amelija2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a "sockpuppet" but a real user. I have no connection to Platonics and I feel my account should be unblocked, please. I joined Wikipedia because as an author I needed to find a place to start my research on Atlantis. I found that the article had a POV that was so unbalanced that I had to say something. Bender235 responded to my post and was abusive and rude even though in my post I did not mention anyone by name and and only asked that the POV be balanced. After my exchange with Bender235 I was accused of attacking him by another person (Dougweller) who was not even involved with the conversation. Bender235 belittled my intelligence and then proceeded in another rant to call people like me (who do not follow his line of thinking) "an army of knuckleheaded meatpuppets". I chose not to engage any further with the Atlantis article because as a new member of the Wikipedia community I felt that I should let more experienced user handle the issue. I originally stated that I had no interest in becoming an editor for Wikipedia. At this time I still have no intention of editing articles but I will not be accused being fictional and let that stand without a response.

Decline reason:

"I still have no intention of editing articles" then there's no need for us to even consider your unblock request. only (talk) 19:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amelija2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

"At this time I do not intend to edit articles" --- whether or not I chose to has no relevance about my account status. My account should not be labeled as a "Sockpuppet" and blocked. In the future - I could decided I would like to edit something and then I will have to go through this whole process before I can even contribute yet it can be solved right now. To block my account is a deterrent to me wanting to be an editor. It's a punishment for something I did not do. Amelija2 (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2014 (UTC) Amelija2

Decline reason:

Firstly, you editing interests and conduct are similar to Platonics. Secondly, if you don't want to be an editor, we can just blank this page. PhilKnight (talk) 03:07, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.