Your submission at Articles for creation: ISO 7101: 2023 (July 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Loksmythe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Loksmythe (talk) 17:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Almquality! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Loksmythe (talk) 17:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
This is not advertising. You may delete if you would like, but I might suggest that you know a bit more about a topic before stating it is advertising. ISO standards are international consensus standards written for free by volunteers. We do not make money off these standards. We do not sell these standards. There are many ISO standards on Wikipedia with similar entries. For example, ISO 9001. ISO 7101 is a standard that is very similar to ISO 9001 but is healthcare specific. However, I see ISO 9001 has not been deemed as advertising. This is actually a very important new standard that is a very positive contribution to the world. There are few things more important than human health. 37.131.185.189 (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:ISO 7101: 2023 edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:ISO 7101: 2023, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Loksmythe (talk) 17:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

May I ask that you please return (retrieve) the deleted material for future reference or improvement as outlined in my options under speedy deletion? It took me quite some time to write it.
Thank you,
Angela Almquality (talk) 19:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply