User talk:Alexandria/archive3

Previous archives: Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Maguire Kings

Articles_for_deletion/Maguire_Kings

Any comments on this? Unknown Unknowns 12:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

My RFA

Thanks for lending me your support on my RFA. I didn't quite make it this time through, but I'll be back soon enough to give it another go! Hiberniantears 14:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Checkuser on AdilBaguirov

Sorry, I corrected the code, it should have been B, an evasion of a ban by arbcom. Francis had used the wrong code. Its an evasion of a ban, as AdilBaguirov has done before. See the previous check user case that I posted and my comments on the current one. Thanks.Hajji Piruz 15:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I posted the arbcom link.Hajji Piruz 15:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

There is no problem with the check user now, is it all ok?Hajji Piruz 15:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, can you post that on the checkuser page so as to avoid confusion for the checkers.Hajji Piruz 15:41, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Titans (Webcomic)

For crying out load, man. The reason why it hasn't got much on it is because I just created it. I wanted to get the damn page up before adding more stuff to it. Don't get your knickers in a twist just because a page isn't created perfectly immediately. Don't get your knickers in a twist and select every new page for speedy deletion. In fact, I'm going to go cliché and say you're the cancer that is killing Wikipedia. There, I said it. Give me a day or two before being a dick. And don't moan that I'm insulting you, since your behaviour simply called for it. --D'Argent 17:18, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Hiya!

You may want to take a look at this: [1]]. Hope I haven't been overly bold, but I didn't know whether you'd want to respond yourself!--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 23:04, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Your RfA

Hi, I see your undergoing an RfA. I really wish you the best of luck, I know that an RfA can be a harsh process, and if you need anything, feel free to ask. Cheers, Dfrg.msc 07:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States Presidents by longevity (2nd nomination)

You commented that there was a discussion, I looked at all the talk pages for each article suggested to be merged into the by age one, there was no active discussion at the time I put it up for deletion. Kwsn^(Ni!) 18:47, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi Kwsn, I meant the discussion at talk:List of United States Presidents by age. You're right in that when you nominated there had not been much discussion in a couple of weeks. But I didn't think of that as a very long time, especially when it takes a lot of work to troubleshoot those sortable tables. And really, I'm not sure why you took it to AfD without at least first mentioning it on the talk pages to see if anyone was paying attention, but no big deal... looks like it will all get fixed either way. Cheers! --JayHenry 21:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome

You're welcome for my support in your RfA. :) Acalamari 16:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Same with me! Politics rule 18:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

I wish you best of luck if you choose to go again at a later date, and I will definately support you :) Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 22:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Your RfA

I usually just reply to comments on my own talk page there, but I wanted to be sure you got this one so I'm putting it here instead.

I really hope my comments on your request didn't seem overly harsh or critical, and certainly hope that my opinion and the others expressed in opposition to your request don't discourage you. I've seen many of your contributions to the project and they are by and large of high quality. I value you as an editor. It won't take a lot of development on your part to get me to change my mind, so I do hope to see more of your contributions and hope to see your name in RfA again in the near future. Keep up the good work and I'm sure next time my !vote will be going in the support column. Arkyan • ^(talk) 17:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

I'm still in shock myself... Andre (talk) 09:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC).

AFC Backlog Drive!

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long assessment drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 15, 2007 – August 15, 2007.

Awards to be won range from delicacies such as the WikiCookie to barnstars.
There is a backlog of more than one year, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

This drive was organized by GrooveDog in an attempt to terminate that nasty backlog.

GrooveDog (talk) 01:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Well, I was looking for a prettier way to do this, but I'm not very artistic, so I'll just say thank you for your support in my RfA, which was closed as successful. I look forward to serving the community in a new way. Take care! -- But|seriously|folks  08:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

your question

Sorry, but I forgot what it was. Maybe AFD, maybe RFCU. Somehow, your response seemed to fan the fire. However, in a recent RFCU, you calmed down the fire. I think the think people should be aware is that others may be tense or have anxiety during a contentious situation or article deletion possibility. The first job of the neutral admin is to try to calm things down. There are 1 or 2 admin which stand out as being quick on the trigger and not very friendly. Good luck. You'll do grow in the next month or two and then I'll likely vote "support". I've already seen more tact. Fineday 03:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC) In fact, why not write to me every 2-3 weeks and tell me what articles you've done and I might find similar interests. It's possible that I might even want to nominate you. Fineday 03:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you very much for your support in my recent unsuccessful RfA. I am grateful for all of the advice, and hope that it will help me grow as an editor. Sincerely, Neranei ^T/C 11:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, you're right, RfA shows even your smallest faults like nothing else. It is a really good learning experience though, but it definitely takes some guts to dive in . Thanks again! Warmest regards, Neranei ^T/C 15:56, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Help with article about (Kirk Fraser)

Im sending you a request. I've look over the deletion of Kirk Fraser, The original article had the incorrect spelling of his last name. Check out the (http://www.answers.com/topic/kirk-frasier) the article is still wrong. We originally created a new page on Wikipedia with the correct spelling and paste the content from Wikipedia with the incorrect spelling of Frasier. It was shortly deleted, we once again created it again, and it was also deleted. We don't know what to do. It seems like once it's up it taken down again, when it was originally put up by some one else. We just wanted to change the spelling of the Last name and fix the content that was wrong. Can you please help me in guiding me to correct this issue. Thanks.

Any help

Hello Kwsn, could you let me know how this is going[2]. I want to take an editor to task for it and I suggest that it was uncivil attack. Your user page is great, the Termo is great, how dose it work. I could use one of those. --Domer48 23:12, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

AFC Barnstar debate underway

	WikiProject Articles for Creation needs your input!
	A debate is currently underway concerning a project Barnstar, and the input of all members of the WikiProject is requested. When you get the chance, please drop by the project talk page here and voice your opinion. Due to the size and nature of our project, everyone's opinion counts, so don't be left out! Thanks for your time, and happy editing! Hersfold (talk/work) 02:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Note: You are receiving this message because you are listed as a participant of WikiProject AFC. If you do not want to continue receiving these messages, please make a note on the project page next to your name. Thanks.

WikiProject Articles for creation

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive News!

We are one week in to the drive, and it's already going fantastic. Numerous days of backlogs have been tackled, with hundreds of articles having been reviewed. We do, however, have some news!

First off, a HUGE congratulations to everyone participating so far. I understand some members are inactive due to vacation, but we are still making great progress.

Secondly, make sure that before you go off and review old submissions, that you review all submissions for the present day, and the day before, so that we aren't actually making a bigger backlog, by letting submissions get archived while we're checking stuff from 2006.

Third, remember to update your running total, on the drive page. Honesty is the best policy, so if you lie about the number of articles you've reviewed, we'll all make angry faces while looking at your userpage.

And, last, if you have any questions about the drive, feel free to ask me, or any other members of the project.

Great job, everyone! We're going to get that backlog!
GrooveDog

Automatically delievered by HermesBot 08:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC) ^(Owner)

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I'm awarding you this barnstar for your great work on Wikipedia! Wikidudeman (talk) 15:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Stephen King's inspiration

Hello. Back in May you participated in an AfD discussion on Stephen King's inspiration. I have called this AfD for review as I believe it was deleted against consensus in the discussion. If you have a few moments, would you please read the review and weigh in with your current opinion? Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_22#Stephen_King.27s_inspiration Many thanks. All the best LACameraman 15:48, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

		My RFA
		User:TenPoundHammer and his romp of Wikipedia-editing otters thank you for participating in Hammer's failed request for adminship, and for the helpful tips given to Hammer for his and his otters' next run at gaining the key. Also, Hammer has talked to the otters, and from now on they promise not to leave fish guts and clamshells on the Articles for Deletion pages anymore. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 16:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Checkuser case completed

Hi, A checkuser IP Check case you filled has been completed by a CheckUser, and archived. You can find the results for 7 days at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive. -- lucasbfr ^talk, checkuser clerk, 00:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC).

MascotGuy

I screwed up with my RFCU request, but anyway this guy with strange editing habits keeps making sock puppets, very strange what he does. What I thought I would do is get a basic taste of the IP's he uses (because he uses more than one) and see if we can estimate what the next might be. See Wikipedia:Long term abuse/MascotGuy for more. Apparently he's been at it since 2005. Cheers, JetLover ^(talk) 21:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

What I was thinking is to check out the IP's he uses, and the most recent ones to see which he is currently using. Cheers, JetLover ^(talk) 21:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Pestering

I noticed your comments on the COFS arbcom case. You appear to be a neutral editor, so I was wondering if you could point to instances where I have pestered Justanother? I've actually made it a point to avoid discussion with him unless it is absolutely necessary quite some time ago in order to avoid that appearance. It doesn't mean that pestering him is impossible, just that since I've been trying not to I'm not sure how I did which is why I'm asking you. Anynobody 02:55, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Allegations of Chinese apartheid AfD

Following your recent participation in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 July 30#Allegations of American apartheid, you may be interested to know that a related article, Allegations of Chinese apartheid, is currently being discussed on AfD. Comments can be left at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Chinese apartheid. -- ChrisO 15:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

AFC News

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive News!

We are nine days away from the end of the drive, and it's been fantastic! Many, many, many days of backlog have been tackled, and over 1500 articles reviewed!

To start off, a HUGE THANKS to everyone who helped out with the coordination of the drive, and actually fighting the backlog in the drive itself. Everyone's done a great job helping out, no matter how many articles you've reviewed/

Remember to update your running total, on the drive page. This is the ONLY way that I will be able to give out awards appropriately.

Lastly, I will be giving out awards on August 16th. Anyone who could help me, that would be fantastic. Contact me on my talk page if you'd like to volunteer.

Great job, everyone! This Drive has been fantastic, and I'm sure that some members of the Project have definitely made friends by collaborating on the talk pages. Thanks,
GrooveDog

List of Scientologists

Is not listed for AfD, currently just a red link. I'm removing the AfD tag on the article., if you do go ahead and list it feel free to put it back on. Mathmo ^Talk 01:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I see now it has been listed.... kind of, but is directing to the List of Scientologist celebrities AfD. This is not correct process, as you are including it after it has already started it. Please strike it out yourself. Mathmo ^Talk 01:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied, here. Mathmo ^Talk 01:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Dew wall

That is a SWEET Dew wall! How long did that take you, and how do you make sure it doesn't fall down? bmitchelf•T•F 13:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,Newyorkbrad 18:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

checkuser

I put in a checkuser request for you. Thank you. I'm sorry it's gone this far, but the stink of socks is overwhelming. The socks are calling everybody else socks. If they are caught, maybe they will calm down so everything will get back to normal. Oprahwasontv 02:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes it's true. The socks are calling everybody else socks.

Turtlescrubber 04:59, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar
		For helping create Wikipedia:Wikipedia is a community, an incredible essay, I award you the What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar. Happy editing! Boricuaeddie 21:22, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Reply

See my talk. --(Review Me) R ^ParlateContribs_@ (Let's Go Yankees!) 13:48, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

TJ Spyke

Can you confirm that sockpuppet accusation? — Moe ε 20:58, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thank you for clearing that up for me. :) — Moe ε 21:12, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SevenOfDiamonds

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SevenOfDiamonds. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SevenOfDiamonds/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SevenOfDiamonds/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (t) 22:29, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC).

re db-spam and db-ad

Huh? what do you mean?--Jac16888 14:13, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm, thats odd, i never saw your tag, i just came across the article, added the tag and shrunk the images down. not quite sure how this happened.--Jac16888 14:17, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

AAAAARRRGGG!!

Joke, burns, Aaaaaggghhhhh! I'm melting! Melting..... Dfrg.msc 05:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Patriots/cameragate

There a multiple clear problems. The first is that it's copied directly from ESPN.com. Secondly it contains weasel words and POV:

"Week 1 - Cheaters?" - POV

"NFL commissioner Roger Goodell has determined" -- he hasn't determined anything publicly

"Sources say" -- Mortensen's sources, not verifiable at all

"The team did not have a satisfactory explanation" -- POV

In other words, it really needs to be cleaned up before it goes in. First sourcing is a big problem, secondly it may be better to take a step back and wait, because absolutely nothing has been made official yet. Pats1 22:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Meh, as long as it's well-sourced. But everything at this point is "sources say" or "allegedly accused of," so it's very difficult to verify. Speculation, really. Pats1 22:39, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Right, but information that is speculative in nature is difficult to verify. Pats1 22:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

The "sources:" part. Pats1 22:53, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

Click there to open your card! → → →

Dearest Kwsn,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 96 supports, 1 oppose, and 3 neutrals. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm a new admin remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them. I would like to give a special shout out to Hirohisat, Wizardman, and Husond, for there original co-nominations. Thank you once again and good day.

Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor

Credits

This RFA thanks was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunatly this is not entirely my own design.

My RfA

I owe you a big thank you for supporting me in My RfA, which was successful with 67 supports and 20 opposes. - Penwhale | ^{Blast him / Follow his steps} 23:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Burgz33

Regarding this CheckUser request...would it make sense to determine if the named accounts were registered from a smaller set of IP addresses? It appears that the user is still using named accounts to make edits. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:34, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

My recent RfA

Thank you for supporting my RfA, which unfortunately didn't succeed. The majority of the opposes stated that I needed more experience in the main namespace and Wikipedia namespace, so that is what I will do. I will go for another RfA in two month's time and I hope you will be able to support me then as well. If you have any other comments for me or wish to be notified when I go for another RfA, please leave them on my talk page. If you wish to nominate me for my next RfA, please wait until it has been two months. Thanks again for participating in my RfA! -- Cobi^(t|c|b|cn) 02:04, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 17:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC).

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ferrylodge

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ferrylodge. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ferrylodge/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ferrylodge/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 16:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Montague jeffery

Third time lucky... Verbatim copyvio from here. Wonder why the bot didn't spot it? — iridescent (talk to me!) 23:37, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Odd, well usually things that have fringe notability and the article reads like an ad will probably have copyvio problems, more so for companies and bands since it's usually taken from the about section. Kwsn(Ni!) 15:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Uh, what?

Just winding up a friend. 81.158.211.115 20:12, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

It's alright, I scared him off using Wikipedia ever again now anyway. 81.158.211.115 20:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page, much appreciated! Lloydpick 00:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)