User talk:Aldnonymous/Archive 001
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Notice Board Hot headed...? angry...? unsolved problem(s)...? LET'S FIND SOLUTION LET'S TALK... read WP:CIVIL...
anything that not related to Anime and South East Asia article Post here if there is any problem that you want to discuss with me feel free to post it freely here...
Is this a good place to discuss things? You erased my link to a blog , so I put in another reference and added the link to the blog . The blog is written by a california lawyer in regard to a law case. It backs up the first reference to the federal law case. The blog is not a commercial site, it gives back ground info to the other reference. Well if you erase it again- no big deal. I also got a "warning" for writing about a living person , what did I write about a living person? Nothing as far as I can see. (Vivvvvek (talk) 18:03, 24 April 2011 (UTC))
- Read WP:NOT I don't care if that written by california lawyer or stuff... but please... do not add that blog website AS EXTERNAL LINK(S) Read WP:NOT for the detail... sorry for my harh words... it's kind of my habit... --Ald™ ¬_¬™ 18:37, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Ok, how about the link to the yahoo site (that was removed) is that also a no-no? The yahoo site has existed for 10 years, has lots of inside info about Sri C that does not come to light on the official web sites that is allowed a space there. (I am sorry , I have the same IQ as you, I just don't spend so much time on Wiki, no problem with the "harsh tone") (Vivvvvek (talk) 18:03, 24 April 2011 (UTC))
- ah lol that iq thing is just for joke...
anyway... as i says don't make that kind of links as external links you can make them as references. as you can see i didn't remove your ref links, making them as external links violating WP:NOT , and cheer happy edit --Ald™ ¬_¬™ 18:54, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
ok, well you initially removed the blog ref link, then I removed it because of what you said here. and that is fine I will leave it like that now. Ok so I will see if I can fit the yahoo site into referance then, not as external link (Vivvvvek (talk) 18:03, 24 April 2011 (UTC))
Anime Related
Post Them here.
You can post any question about Indonesia here
Your addition to State University of Malang has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ttonyb (talk) 07:23, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- Done Thx for The Info.Aldnonymous (talk) 07:29, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of State University of Malang
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on State University of Malang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 17:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
Dabomb87 (talk) 22:19, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Personal God (Muslim View)
hello, i just saw your revert on my entry.. sorry if you feel that i dont use proper word on that entry. actually i just copy & paste the sentences with minor trim from the given reference. I really appreciate if you can re-word the sentences to make it sound better without deleting it.. i am newcomer, please dont bite me, please :)
this is where i copied the sentence: http://www.al-islam.org/encyclopedia/chapter9/1.html - Some Sunni scholars hold beliefs which would imply that Allah has body, but not like the bodies that we know, of course. - However Ash'arites (followers of Abul-Hasan al-Ash'ari) which include a vast amount of Sunnis, do NOT interpret face, hand, and leg as physical organs.
I also found the the following entry from another wikia website.. can i just copy and paste it and give the same reference? because this view of aha'ari is being followed by majoriti of sunni. http://islam.wikia.com/wiki/Sunni#cite_note-4 - Regarding the nature of God and the divine attributes, the Ash'ari rejected the Mu'tazilite position that all Qur'anic references to God as having physical attributes (that is, a body) were metaphorical.[5] Ash'aris insisted that these attributes were "true", since the Qur'an could not be in error, but that they were not to be understood as implying a crude anthropomorphism.
p/s: sorry for my bad english as it is not my mother tongue —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.49.121.28 (talk) 15:46, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
- ah ok thx for telling me this... i'll work on this one...Ald™ ¬_¬™ 23:59, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
- Done1st if there's anything that i can help with. don't be timid, ask me, i'll do it right away. Cheers! Ald™ ¬_¬™ 00:14, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
- sure, i really appreciate it... ;) thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.54.114.82 (talk) 04:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
"Fuck You!" (song)
Quick note: I am not swearing at you!
I noticed that you helped secure that page by reversing another edit by another vandal. I'm glad that I wasn't misinterpreted as the one vandalizing the page, but I had problems originally in trying to reverse the vandalism to a better copy. Thanks!
AWDRacer (talk) 20:01, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
- AHAHAHA!!! i swear i got shocked when i read "Fuck You!" thing(LOL),,, thank you for thanking me (LOL)Cheers!--Ald™ ¬_¬™ 20:05, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
LOL!
You're welcome!
I couldn't resist dropping an expletive on your page that time :D
Regarding the "better copy" - Oh no, you did the right thing. I was just explaining what was going on with my multiple edits, and that was because I had trouble reversing the edits made by those couple of guys. I was just complimenting you on securing that page against vandalizers. :)
AWDRacer (talk) 20:45, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
- you should ask for WP:ROLLBACK or try using WP:TW , as for WP:TW this helping me a lot fighting the vandal. (oops i sounds like advertising right now) well anyway there is a lot of way fighting vandals like WP:Igloo but Igloo makes auto report on vandal's page and i can't make a further explanation about the detail of the vandalism i like to talk to the user and show them the right way doing edit, and as for me, doing manually using Undo button seems tiring. Ald™ ¬_¬™ 20:56, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
The article Yuka Saitou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Seems to fail WP:BIO as I can't find any reliable sources.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 13:28, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Mariko Honda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Seems to fail WP:BIO as I cannot find any reliable sources.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 13:30, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
per article
Yuka Saitou Mariko Honda please read WP:A&M/ORS
Nomination of Mariko Honda for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mariko Honda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariko Honda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Inks.LWC (talk) 18:21, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Yuka Saitou for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yuka Saitou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuka Saitou until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Inks.LWC (talk) 18:30, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Tomosa Murata has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 19:08, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Tooru Nara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 19:10, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Fumi Morisawa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO, as the only reference it has is a promo-website for the subject, and I was unable to find any reliable sources.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 19:13, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the warm welcome!
Thank you very much for the warm welcome! I have read many of the how-to articles for Wikipedians; I'll review your list to see if I've missed any of those. It's nice to be able to touch up distracting bits of unclear and/or ungrammatical text. I'll aim to be well-prepared before I do anything more substantive. Thanks again! TennTwister (talk) 21:58, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
minta tolong
Aldo, tolong donk saya sedang diblokir 6 bulan di WBI. Padahal coba deh liat 2 pranala ini :
serangan pribadi serta makian (dalam bahasa Inggris) 1
makian dalam bahasa Inggris 2
Yap, kedua pranala tersebut menunjukan makian kasar nggilani lan ngedani dalam bahasa inggris dari salah satu pengguna bernama Serenity. Serenity itu termasuk dalam pengguna lama dari WBI tapi masih berstatus pengguna WBI biasa namun setidaknya keseniorannya telah terkemuka mengingat ia salah satu pembangun Wikimedia Indonesia. Tapi betapa anehnya jika Anda dan saya melihat makian itu yang ternyata dibuat oleh seorang senior. Geleng geleng kepala saya. Saya liat log pemblokirannya ternyata lagi hanya pernah diblokir selama palingan 2 jam dalam 2X berturut-turut. Yalah mungkin karena dia kontributor WBI senior yang lagi stress jadi terpaksa dilakukan pemblokiran untuk ya palingan penenangan aja. Tapi bagaimana dengan saya yang juga udah WBIwan aktif diblokir sampai 6 bulan ? Yalah mungkin karena saya pernah diblokri karena melakukan hal keburukan yang sama sehingga segitu lamanya. Memang benar demikian. Dulu pernah diblokir selama seminggu dan sebulan. Tapi masak sih sebagai kontributor terpandang didemikiankan ? Kenapa tak 2 jam seperti si Serenity ? Apakah pendaftar tahun 2009 masih dianggap newbie bagi mereka ? Apakah mereka itu WikiVampir sehingga ngelakuin kelakuan kaya ginian ==> id:Wikipedia:Silakan hantam. Bukankah sudah diatur disini bahwa setiap pengguna harus dipikirkan secara positif bahwa mereka ingin berkontribusi yang baik untuk kemajuan di WBI. Dan sebagai pengguna yang baik hati tolong sampaikan pertimbangan ini di Warung Kopi atau para pengurus yang ada di WBI --Erik Evrest 10:49, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- halo Erik Evrest saya sudah lihat dan melakukan penyelidikan. sepertinya anda meminta pertolongan hampir ke semua pengguna bahasa indonesia di wikipedia inggris.
saya cuma bia beri saran anda bisa menyerang balik dengan tuduhan id:Wikipedia:Kesopanan. Dalam kasus anda saya melihat anda tidak memberikan tag puppet kepada account anda yg lain sehingga mungkin orang lain menganggap anda melakukan shockpuppet, atau mungkin hanya saya yang salah melihat. Anda bisa meminta tolong pada id:Pengguna:Bennylin untuk hal ini. saya memiliki perasaan sensisitf kepada wikipedia indonesia karena kebanyakan pengurus di sana tidaklah netral dan kebanyakan hanya mengutamakan jumlah kontribusi dan bukan mengutamakan kualitas artikel. maaf atas ketidakmampuan saya, saya berjanji akan berusaha/melihat apakah saya bisa membantu semampu saya (membantu anda) atau tidak. terima kasih.
File source problem with File:Lambang Universitas Negeri Surabaya.gif
Thank you for uploading File:Lambang Universitas Negeri Surabaya.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:01, 1 October 2011 (UTC)