Templers edit

Should the Reference to the Knights Templar be on the Templers article? I see absolutely no connection between the two organisations, except the similarity of the names. But 'Templer' in the Temple Society context uses the biblical reference quoted, that sees the body of a person as a temple for the spirit of God.

'Templar' in Knights Templar, seems to imply a custodian of a physical place in Jerusalem: Their popular name alludes to their historical headquarters in Qubbat es-Sakhrah (Dome of the Rock), an Islamic shrine on the summit of Mount Moriah in Jerusalem, which they renamed Templum Domini (Temple of the Lord). Aklink.


Pilatus edit

What a pleasant surprise! My thanks to Pilatus for the help with the Jaffa Oranges emblem in TEMPLE SOCIETY. Aklink

Wikipedia needs you edit

Hi, Aklink. You have helped with a number of articles in the past, but you haven't edited any articles in a while. Could you make some new contributions soon to help make Wikipedia better?

I hope you decide to become a more active contributor again. Feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. -- ForteTuba 02:51, 25 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Former Templer Settlements.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Former Templer Settlements.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 10:28, 12 March 2006 (UTC)Reply


Fair use rationale for Image:Sarona Garden.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sarona Garden.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks STBotI, I am not sure if i did the correct thing this time, could you please check the image Sarona Garden again? I have added what I feel is a fair use rationale in plain writing. I could not find a way to insert the Fair Use Template into the Image Edit Page. 144.135.111.168 (talk) 06:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 1 February 2008 at 1700hrReply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sarona Garden.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Sarona Garden.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:25, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Jaffa_Oranges.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jaffa_Oranges.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rockfang (talk) 20:08, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ernest Edgar Kurth (April 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 
Hello! Aklink, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Professor Ernest Edgar Kurth.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Professor Ernest Edgar Kurth.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 08:52, 10 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at AfC E. E. Kurth was accepted edit

 
E. E. Kurth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zach Vega (talk to me) 02:28, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, Zach Vega for helping me to get the E. E. Kurth profile on Wikipedia. Professor Kurth is part of our Australian Cultural Heritage and should be listed as such. I shall try and catch up with the outstanding points mentioned. Aklink (talk) 03:28, 1 July 2014 (UTC) aklinkReply

File copyright problem with File:Professor Ernest Edgar Kurth.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Professor Ernest Edgar Kurth.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply