Ahadzhiyska1

Hello everyone!

Please feel free to ask me anything - very glad I can contribute to the community!

Alexandrina

Shiprocket

Reverted 1 Pending Edit to Revision

Good morning Jackfork!

Thank you for taking the time to review my submission for Requested Article.

I added the submission alongside 10 different, high quality, third-party sources to my submission, which cover multiple aspects of the reasoning behind why the subject that I would like to contribute to is notable. Those are listed here:

1. A Wikipedia article about Naspers Group, where PayU is featured under brands and subsidiaries. 2. An article from Tech Crunch that covers fast-growing markets and features PayU as a company working in such markets. 3. An article from Naspers Group that talks about the appointment of the PayU CEO. 4. An article in Spanish from Telesintese that features an investment in PayU. 5. An article from Medianama which talks about payment aggregators in India and features PayU. 6. An article in pymnts.com which talks about PayU investing in Remitly. 7. An article in hamburg.news talking about Kreditech's expansion to India where PayU is featured. 8. An article in Polish from Spider's Web PL which talks about PayU and Aliexpress. 9. An article in Livemint which talks about digital banking in India and features Jitendra Gupta from PayU.

I see that you have commented that my submission is not notable yet due to the fact that the sources I had added to it cover the "same release from different places". Could you please let me know what you mean by this, given the above mentioned sources and corresponding articles? I believe I've followed guidelines correctly and submitted sufficient support for my Requested Article.

Thank you and kind regards, Ahadzhiyska1 (talk) 09:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

I will look into when have time later this evening.Jackfork (talk) 13:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

I looked at your requested article and it looks to be about a small subsidiary called Shiprocket not PayU. The sources I checked for Shiprocket contained information that probably came from the same news release. That plus the small size does not make it notable. Please correct if I'm got this mixed up with something else. Jackfork (talk) 14:08, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi again. I have absolutely no idea what Shiprocket is. I've never submitted a requested article for this subject. In fact, I just checked and such a request doesn't even exist in the Requested Articles. Here is my submission:

(cur | prev) 09:11, 13 November 2017‎ Ahadzhiyska1 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (269,972 bytes) (+963)‎ . . (→‎Pa-Pm: Added PayU - Fintech and Payment Service Provider, part of Naspers Group.) (undo) [accepted by Slightlymad] 

I believe you have edited someone else's submission and replied to me instead? See here:

(cur | prev) 05:22, 14 November 2017‎ Jackfork (talk | contribs)‎ . . (269,972 bytes) (-873)‎ . . (Reverted 1 pending edit by 125.63.65.106 to revision 810095969 by Ahadzhiyska1: Not notable yet, posted what appears to be the same news release from different places.) (undo | thank) [automatically accepted]
(cur | prev) 05:01, 14 November 2017‎ 125.63.65.106 (talk)‎ . . (270,845 bytes) (+873)‎ . . (→‎S) (undo)

Could you please take a look again?

Thank you very much, Alexandrina Ahadzhiyska1 (talk) 07:55, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Jackfork - would you mind taking a look at what I wrote above and let me know your thoughts? Thank you! :) Ahadzhiyska1 (talk) 15:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: PayU (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PayU and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:PayU, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:08, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Ahadzhiyska1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:08, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia has extremely high standards for company articles, as the project receives many submissions from editors associated with the companies they're submitting articles for. Most companies will never be able to surpass that standard - for good reason. As I've told other submitters, our standards are so high that I've had to fight to keep household-name companies in my country multiple times.

Many submitters think quantity of citations is going to help their submission - but what Wikipedia is concerned with is quality. There is no point submitting forty citations if they don't contribute to the article: if they're not in reliable sources, if they're not independent of the subject, if they're not about the subject, and if they don't consist of significant coverage. A whole 21 of those references tell the pre-acquisition history of two subsidiaries in unnecessary detail. Most of the rest are links to specific investments, which are tangential at best to the notability of the company. Sources like this are particularly useless - reviewers can see that it barely even mentions the company.

It needs to explain (if indeed it is the case) why this particular company is more significant than your average e-commerce company, and to reference this to significant coverage in reliable sources. At the moment it just tells us that a subsidiary of a bigger company acquired a bunch of smaller companies, provides the expected services for that field, and invested in other companies, and cites a bunch of barely-relevant stuff along the way. The Drover's Wife (talk) 10:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

File:PayU Corporate Logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PayU Corporate Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:PayU

Hello, Ahadzhiyska1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "PayU".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 08:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)