Aftabpir

April 2024

Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, I'm Vanderwaalforces. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, International Astronomy Olympiad, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm RoboCric. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of International Astronomy Olympiad. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robo^Cric Let's chat 20:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The International Astronomy Olympiad (April 10)

Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost impossible to read. Everything is text wrapped around an external link. That isn't how Wikipedia works. Please read WP:REFSTART to understand how references are used and formatted. Sorry, but I can't make any sense of this as it is written

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The International Astronomy Olympiad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Aftabpir! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The International Astronomy Olympiad (April 10)

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chaotic Enby was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources should be added in ref tags, not as external links in the body. See WP:Referencing for beginners, and many of the sources (like Newsbreak, Medium or other wikis) shouldn't be used. Prose should also be made a little more encyclopedic. Good luck!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The International Astronomy Olympiad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 21:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic