Adxp
One sentence followed by a link to the homepage looks like linkspam, and in any case the article is deletable as lacking substantive content, and not providing independent verifiable sources to notability (it's not clear to me that the second link is either of these.) If there are better references, add them.
Jimfbleak (talk) 12:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- It's one sentence - there's nothing to stop you recreating as a more substantial article. Jimfbleak (talk) 12:21, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:General-aviation-katana.jpeg edit
Thank you for uploading File:General-aviation-katana.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 05:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Nomination of Face Up (magazine) for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Face Up (magazine) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Dronebogus (talk) 06:32, 1 March 2021 (UTC)