Admit-the-truth

Welcome

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 01:20, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Muhammad and assassinations

Hello Admit-the-truth. Though I hope you have been reading my edit summaries, I want to get this message to you very clearly so there's no confusion. You cannot copy and paste copyrighted content in the above article except for short quotes (in quotation marks with an inline citation providing the source). When I removed the content from the background section noting in the edit summary that it was infringing text, I assumed that you had read that edit summary because when you added it back, you did so with modifications. Unfortunately, this is still a copyright infringement, as you only made superficial changes to the original text. As I referred to in the edit summary where I removed the material again, this is not sufficient; please read Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. I have now reverted your third posting of the material. Please stop. You may (and should!) use outside sources for information, but you may not use their words, their phrasing, their sentences. Please note that if you continue to repost the material you may be blocked from editing. Thank you for understanding.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:04, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Caravan Raids

There's a discussion going on at the talk page please do add questionable material without resolving the dispute.See WP:3RR WP:RS WP:OR --NotedGrant Talk 17:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for adding back copyright violating material to Muhammad and assassinations, ignoring four prior removals. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:19, 7 December 2009 (UTC)) 05:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Admit-the-truth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do not think it is COPYRIGHT or copy vio (regarding Muhammad and assassinations), i have re written it according to wiki guidlines. also it uses a quote which is allowed in wiki. Quotes are not copy vio, u ban me because of copyright??? what the heck

Decline reason:

You ignored warnings to stop cutting-and-pasting from other source; also evidence of sockpuppetry. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To reviewing admin. Copyvio is from here. See my post to this user higher on this page, and the following diffs (which also imply socking going on): [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] and [7].--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:18, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

sp

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Misconceptions2. Thank you. NotedGrant Talk 16:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by MuZemike 17:40, 8 December 2009 (UTC))
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Fair use rationale for File:Shariff Idd.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shariff Idd.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Raziman T V (talk) 14:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Sharifuddin Khalifa for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Sharifuddin Khalifa, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharifuddin Khalifa until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 17:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)