Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 07:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Aditya332! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 07:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits of Sequence

edit

I have reverted two times your recent edit of Sequence. It cannot be accepted because it breaks at least two fundamental rules of Wikipedia:

  • There is a conflict of interest (see WP:COI) as these sequences are named after your name
  • This is original research, as there is no reliable source available (see WP:OR and WP: Reliable sources)

Moreover your edit doe not respect the guidelines of the manual of style (see WP:MOS and MOS:MATH.

Also, your edit is so badly written that it is difficult to understand it, even for a professional mathematician. However, it seems that it is about the finite difference operator, and its inverse, the finite summation operator. The theory of these operator is classical and has been the subject of many publications, since Jacob Bernouilli. Although there are many related Wikipedia article, this theory is badly described in Wikipedia. Improving this aspect of Wikipedia would be a very useful task. However, reading your edit, it seems that you have not the competence (in mathematics, and for editing Wikipedia) for such a task. D.Lazard (talk) 15:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

March 2019

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Sequence shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Just plain Bill (talk) 15:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Welcome Aditya332!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 47,585,075 registered editors!
Hello, Aditya332. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm Worldbruce, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:
  The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia
  A Primer for Newcomers
  Introduction to Wikipedia
  Wikipedia Training Modules
  Simplified Manual of Style
  Creating a new article via the Article Wizard
When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:
  1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly
  2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources
  3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

  Brochures: Editing Wikipedia & Illustrating Wikipedia
  Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia
  Help

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the   button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, Worldbruce (talk) 13:40, 1 April 2019 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)Reply