Misleading edit summary

edit

  Hello, I'm Anachronist. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Abraham in Islam in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You didn't add information as claimed in your edit summary, you removed information including citations. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:58, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Abraham in Islam, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Smallangryplanet (talk) 12:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

February 2024

edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Islam. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Zsohl(Talk) 06:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm TheAafi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Muhammad Ali Mirza have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ─ Aafī (talk) 15:31, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply