March 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Bongwarrior. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and it has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please stop edit

You peculiar attempts to rename the Edward Jeffries article are disruptive. If you think you have a case for renaming it, you should submit a request to WP:Requested moves. Favonian (talk) 20:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Edward Jeffries, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. It's pretty clear that you're trying to promote this person (like this?); not only is promotion a no-no, but the "peculiar" way in which you go about it is particularly disruptive. If you continue, you will be blocked. Drmies (talk) 20:37, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply


read ya dam arse messages dick ;) i own the rights to that name..... i am considering making a take down knowtice then

  • Right back atcha. I just looked at a dozen articles where you inserted a letter. You're not not here to improve the encyclopedia (see WP:NOTHERE) and I'm blocking your account indefinitely. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 20:40, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Drmies (talk) 20:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

remove the page at once! if you will not allow us to post. we do not give you permission to use the TITTLE under intellectual property! remove the page at once or change the name/tittle.

you are scamming visitors from our website/s making it look like this is the read person. which its not. this is fraud and misleading