99.185.56.156

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

07:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Legobot (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Talk page messages

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Rant

No need to get personal about this. This silly rant of yours has absolutely nothing to do with improving this article. Accusing me of being a liberal (which I am not, btw) isn't helping anyone and has nothing to do with this article. What's your problem? Mythic Writerlord (talk) 15:54, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Justice House of Prayer, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Justice House of Prayer was changed by 99.185.56.156 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872021 on 2012-03-24T23:45:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:45, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Talk pages

Please keep your comments on talk pages related to discussions of improving the associated article. Talk pages are not discussion forums for the topic itself. See WP:TALK, especially the point about trolling. a13ean (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Super Bowl ring, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Brian (talk) 19:20, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:BrianDeeG with this edit. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you, Jim1138 (talk) 19:23, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for insulting and harassing other users. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. RunningOnBrains^(talk) 19:58, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Three Stooges (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Three Stooges (film) was changed by 99.185.56.156 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928541 on 2012-05-28T22:38:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:38, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Car Talk appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please do not insert opinions without a source.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:08, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to American Pie Presents: The Naked Mile. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Meters (talk) 19:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

I gave you 2 weeks and you've made no effort to correct the problems I pointed out on our discussion on my Talk page. I'm reverting. Meters (talk) 22:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Hillsong Church, you may be blocked from editing. As well as non-neutral promotion of the New York church, adding unreferenced claims re hostility to Pentecostals in New York, and adding comments on the article's accuracy to the article itself - talk about the article on its talk page, not in the article. Halsteadk (talk) 12:34, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Snopes.com has been reverted.
Your edit here to Snopes.com was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/06/snopes-scrubs-article-on-obamas-mamas.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:42, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

You have been blocked from editing because you do not seem to have grasped the way Wikipedia works. Despite numerous attempts to explain the situation to you, and an earlier short block, you continue to post expressions of your personal opinions in articles, frequently amounting to attacks on people you disagree with, to post potentially controversial claims without citing reliable sources (often without any sources), and to make personal attacks on other editors on talk pages. You have continued to edit in this way for a matter of months. If you think there are good reasons why you should be be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:49, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

99.185.56.156 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Baha Wikipedia PUNISHES people for THOUGHT crimes then REVERSE ENGINEERS reasons why they should be banned. They capriciously block CONSERVATIVES at a ratio of 5:1. What does that tell you. There's nothing a wiki editor HATES more than a conservative Christian. They expect you to KISS THEIR ASS or you'll be blocked. Why does wikipedia have a reputation as a JOKE? Just look to my page. "Disruptive Editing"? What does that mean? Not sucking up to the liberal orthodoxy. POV? That means pushing back against the liberal mantras that permeate Wikipedia. In short, Wikipedia has LOST it's credibility and I'm delighted to be exhibit number 12,033,323,403. 99.185.56.156 (talk) 07:20, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Since you abused your ability to file unblock requests by posting insults, it has been withdrawn from you. Max Semenik (talk) 08:30, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Partisan Bickering and Name-Calling

Please keep your political opinions to yourself as Wikipedia is neutral and based on verifiability (see your post on this article). Calling editors "liberal" as a slur is not conducive to any constructive editing.--Ðrdak (T) 03:10, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

ANI Discussion

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Ðrdak (T) 04:40, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

• I'm confused as to why you're continuing the patently disruptive behavior that you've been repeatedly warned and blocked for, but there's no excuses considering your past here. I've reinstated your block for a period of six months. Swarm ^X 06:39, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Adlai E. Stevenson High School (Livonia, Michigan)

People must be notable by Wikipedia standards and should have a Wikipedia page in order to be on lists. There are exceptions. See wp:listpeople wp:wtaf Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 07:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Adlai E. Stevenson High School (Livonia, Michigan), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 07:20, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Adlai E. Stevenson High School (Livonia, Michigan). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 07:27, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, 99.185.56.156. You have new messages at Jim1138's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

---