94.192.96.81

July 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

94.192.96.81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am being Bullied from User talk:Ponyo as I have been making constructive edits in recent days! Yet this user is abusing his or her power by blocking me, even when I update pages that are several days or months out of date! This website is becoming a cult, which is ruining the editoral experince for others, like me.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for WP:EVADE but haven't addressed this in your unblock request. As per below, blocks apply to you, you the person. While your original account is blocked, you are not permitted to edit here. It doesn't matter what account you use (or if you edit anonymously); you are not permitted to edit. Yamla (talk) 16:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

94.192.96.81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Apparently I am banned for WP:EVADE and that is not true! I have been making constructive edits as well as updating outdated pages and my original ban expired 48 hours ago, please revoke the ban as it is massively unfair in my opinion. And FYI, I am not the person behind LFC2020

Decline reason:

It is immaterial if you made constructive edits; you should not be making any edits other than requesting unblock. 331dot (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
I think that you are User:LFC2020. Talk page access will be removed for the duration of the block. ST47 (talk) 21:27, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

94.192.96.81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Apparently I am banned for WP:EVADE and that is not true! I can also 100% confirm that I am not the person behind LFC2020. If the ban is overturned, I will use Wikipedia much better than before and that's a promise.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:10, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

94.192.96.81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Apparently I am banned for WP:EVADE and that is not true! I can also 100% confirm that I am not the person behind LFC2020 like Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} is speculating. In addition to this, the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead.

Decline reason:

You won't do what again? Evade a block? You just said that you're not evading a block! How can you stop evading a block if you're not evading a block? This unblock request is nonsensical. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:31, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots}, You did not block a user called, SLBedit when he was vandalising a page! You just blocked me! For me this is online bullying because I put the stats in that should be included and yet...I get blocked?! Tell me how is that fair? Oh wait, it's not.
• You, the individual behind the keyboard, are blocked from editing Wikipedia indefinitely, not matter which IP or account you are using or create. To reviewing admins, you can see additional discussion here.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:45, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Blanking

You are not permitted to remove or edit declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. Also, note that your unblock request above is malformed. Do you wish me to correct it for you? --Yamla (talk) 16:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

You may also want to address the concern that (if I'm reading things correctly), you are the person behind LFC2020. --Yamla (talk) 16:40, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

---